The immunocompromised district in Dermatology: A unifying pathogenic view of the regional immune dysregulation

Abstract Besides the systemic immune deficiency, a sectorial default in immune control may occur in immunocompetent subjects. This regional immune defect can appear and remain confined to differently damaged skin areas, lately labeled ‘immunocompromised districts’ (ICDs). An ICD is a skin area more...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinics in dermatology
Main Authors: Ruocco, Vincenzo, MD, Ruocco, Eleonora, MD, PhD, Piccolo, Vincenzo, MD, Brunetti, Giampiero, MD, Guerrera, Luigi Pio, MS, Wolf, Ronni, MD
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Besides the systemic immune deficiency, a sectorial default in immune control may occur in immunocompetent subjects. This regional immune defect can appear and remain confined to differently damaged skin areas, lately labeled ‘immunocompromised districts’ (ICDs). An ICD is a skin area more vulnerable than the rest of the body for genetic or acquired reasons. Its vulnerability mainly consists in a local dysregulation of the immune control which often facilitates (but sometimes hinders) the local onset of immunity-related eruptions or skin disorders. The factors responsible for localized immune dysregulation are multifarious, being represented by chronic lymphatic stasis, herpetic infections, ionizing or UV radiations, burns, all sorts of trauma (especially amputation), tattooing, intradermal vaccinations, and others of disparate nature (e.g. paralytic stroke, poliomyelitis). Whatever the cause, in time, an ICD may become a vulnerable site, prone to developing opportunistic infections, tumors, or dysimmune reactions (often of granulomatous type), strictly confined to the district itself; however, the opposite may also occur with systemic immune disorders or malignancies that selectively spare the district. In any case, the immunological behavior of an ICD is different from that of the rest of the body. The pathomechanisms involved in this sectorial immune destabilization may reside in locally hampered lymph drainage that hinders the normal trafficking of immunocompetent cells (e.g. chronic lymphedema, post-traumatic lymph stasis) or in a damage to sensory nerve fibers that release immunity-related peptides (e.g. herpetic infections, carpal tunnel syndrome) or in both conditions (e.g. amputation stump, radiation dermatitis). The ICD is a conceptual entity with no definite shape or dimension. It may take an extremely variable form and extent depending on the causative agent, ranging from a minimal area (e.g. intradermal vaccination) or a small area (e.g. herpes simplex infection), through a wide area (e.g. radiotherapy), or a band-like segment (e.g. skin mosaicism, herpes zoster infection), or an acral area ( e.g. carpal tunnel syndrome), up to a whole limb ( e.g. Stewart-Treves syndrome), or even an entire half body ( e.g. brain stroke). Varied newly coined terminology can be used to indicate the specific cause each time responsible for a regional immune dysregulation. The advantage of the umbrella term ICD is that it encompasses all the possible causes involved in a local immune destabilization. An ICD may have a congenital or a post-natal origin and interesting similarities between the two forms exist. An ICD may also take place in patients with a preexisting systemic immune deficiency, thus creating a more vulnerable site in an already vulnerable patient. Identifying a cutaneous ICD in a given patient is an important standpoint for both diagnostic and prevention purposes. This can be proven by the educative clinical examples that are reported here.
ISSN:0738-081X
DOI:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2014.08.005