Nomogram Development and Validation for Predicting Postoperative Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation Based on Paraspinal Muscle Parameters

• Published in: Journal of pain research Vol. 17; pp. 2121 - 2131
• Main Authors: Tang, Ming, Wang, Siyuan, Wang, Yiwen, Zeng, Fanyi, Chen, Mianpeng, Chang, Xindong, He, Mingfei, Fang, Qingqing, Yin, Shiwu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 30-06-2024; Dove; Dove Medical Press
• Subjects: lumbar disc herniation; Muscles; Original Research; percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy; postoperative recurrent lumbar disc herniation; predictive model; China; postoperative recurrent lumbar disc herniation; percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy; predictive model; lumbar disc herniation
• ISSN: 1178-7090; 1178-7090
• DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S459846

Previous studies highlight paraspinal muscles' significance in spinal stability. This study aims to assess paraspinal muscle predictiveness for postoperative recurrent lumbar disc herniation (PRLDH) after lumbar disc herniation patients undergo percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD).
Retrospectively collected data from 232 patients undergoing PETD treatment at our institution between January 2020 and January 2023, randomly allocated into training (60%) and validation (40%) groups. Utilizing Lasso regression and multivariable logistic regression, independent risk factors were identified in the training set to construct a Nomogram model. Internal validation employed Enhanced Bootstrap, with Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) assessing accuracy. Calibration was evaluated through calibration curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) were employed for clinical utility analysis.
Diabetes, Modic changes, and ipsilesional multifidus muscle skeletal muscle index (SMI) were independent predictive factors for PRLDH following PETD (
<0.05). Developed Nomogram model based on selected predictors, uploaded to a web page. AUC for training: 0.921 (95% CI 0.872-0.970), validation: 0.900 (95% CI 0.828-0.972), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded
=5.638/6.259,
=0.688/0.618, and calibration curves exhibited good fit between observed and predicted values. DCA and CIC demonstrate clinical net benefit for both models at risk thresholds of 0.02-1.00 and 0.02-0.80.
The Nomogram predictive model developed based on paraspinal muscle parameters in this study demonstrates excellent predictive capability and aids in personalized risk assessment for PRLDH following PETD.