Effectiveness of Water-Amine Combined Process for CO2 Extraction from Biogas

• Published in: Environmental and Climate Technologies Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 135 - 148
• Main Authors: Zhuk, Hennadiy, Ivanov, Yuriy, Onopa, Liliya, Krushnevych, Serhii, Soltanibereshne, Mehrzad
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Riga Sciendo 01-01-2024; Riga Technical University
• Subjects: Absorbents; Absorption; Agricultural wastes; amines; Biogas; biomethane; Carbon dioxide; Carbon dioxide concentration; Carbon dioxide removal; Combined water; Computer simulation; Energy consumption; Flow rates; Landfill; Landfill gas; Landfills; Methane; Motor fuels; Natural gas; Natural gas distribution; Power consumption; Regeneration; Separation; Sewage; Specific energy; Waste disposal sites; Water absorption; Ukraine
• ISSN: 1691-5208; 2255-8837
• DOI: 10.2478/rtuect-2024-0012

The EU countries are implementing biomethane production projects from biogas, supplying it to the natural gas distribution grid, or using it as motor fuel. It is also extremely relevant for Ukraine, supposing the problems with gas import due to Russian aggression. Biogas production from landfills, agriculture waste, and sewage is already implemented in Ukraine, so the next step must be biomethane production on an industrial scale and the selection of biogas separation technology is important. Using 11 years of industrial experience in biogas production from landfills, wide experience of the different methane-containing gases separations, and small companies’ industrial possibilities, the most applicable separation technologies for Ukraine were selected: amine, water, and combined water amine carbon dioxide separation. These technologies had compared using computer simulation with real landfill biogas flow rate debt. Results of a software simulation of the most applicable water-amine absorption technology were verified using a laboratory setup. For carbon dioxide concentration in biogas at 32–42 % vol., the specific energy consumption when using water absorption is on average 2 times less compared to amine absorption, but at the same time, the loss of methane due to its solubility in water during water absorption amounted to 7.1–7.6 %, with practically no losses in amine absorption, and minor losses at 0.17–2.8 % in combined water-amine technology. The energy consumption of combined water-amine absorption is comparable to that of water absorption due to: a) reduction of heat losses for the regeneration process of saturated amine absorbent, as part of carbon dioxide has already been removed with water technology; b) using the methane excess to compensate power consumption of the biogas compressor during the preliminary water absorption of carbon dioxide and/or to compensate heat costs of the saturated amine absorbent regeneration