Tackling gender disparities in energy research: a diagnostic tool for equality in research centres

• Published in: Energy, sustainability and society Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 51 - 21
• Main Authors: Sánchez-López, Sara, Poveda-Bautista, Rocío, Corona-Sobrino, Carmen, Otero-Hermida, Paula, García-Melón, Mónica
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-12-2024; Springer Nature B.V; BMC
• Subjects: ANP; Case studies; DEMATEL; Diagnostic software; Economics and Management; Energy; Energy industry; Energy Policy; Energy research; Equality; Gender; Gender aspects; Gender gap; Indicators; Inequalities; Leadership; Monitoring; Multiple criterion; Qualitative analysis; Renewable and Green Energy; Research centers; Research centres; Research facilities; SDEWES2023: The puzzle of a sustainable energy transformation: a wide field of actors; sectors and strategies; Sustainable Development; Women; Spain; Energy research; Gender gap; ANP; Equality; DEMATEL; Research centres
• ISSN: 2192-0567
• DOI: 10.1186/s13705-024-00479-8

Background
In a case study in Spain, the unequal proportion of men and women in a research organization in the energy sector is severe, and long-established dynamics that might determine differences in access to leadership positions and inequalities in research careers are evident. The gender gap in historically masculinized fields, such as energy engineering reflects more than simply the differences in male and female values and personalities. This study seeks to explore the gender gap in energy research centres and to identify barriers that potentially hinder the research careers of women. It proposes the development of a diagnostic tool, based upon indicators, to monitor and evaluate gender roles and inequalities in the management of research centres for identifying and addressing the dynamics and obstacles that hinder women's progress in the energy sector and their potential contribution to the field. This participatory multicriteria-based tool prioritizes the proposed indicators by their influence and importance in the context of energy research and applies it to the monitoring of a specific Spanish energy research centre.
Results
The results are threefold: (i) the methodology is adaptable to different research centres; (ii) the analysis of indicators’ prioritization could lead to recommendations that should be addressed first; (iii) the diagnostic tool used in this in-depth case study of an energy research centre in Spain allowed results to be achieved in terms of gender dynamics. Two indicators stand out as the most relevant in our analysis: gender diversity in leadership positions and uncomplicated application of work–life balance measures. In this case study, the measurement of the first indicator has drawn unsatisfactory results, and the research of the latter is considered still insufficient. In conclusion, this difference becomes a vicious or negative circle for attracting and retaining more women to the research centre. Despite these results, no gender gap seems to be recognized and thus, no measures are being taken to improve the situation.
Conclusions
Comprehensive data and contextualized monitoring are necessary to effectively study and enhance the presence and participation of women in the energy science sector. This approach, combining quantitative and qualitative techniques, is suitable for any research centre that would like to monitor its gender gap, identify potential sources of inequity and address them.