Noninvasive Ventilation or CPAP in the Initial Treatment Phase of Small Infants With Respiratory Failure

• Published in: Respiratory care p. respcare.11935
• Main Authors: Miller, Andrew G, Kumar, Karan R, Adagarla, Bhargav S, Haynes, Kaitlyn E, Gates, Rachel M, Muddiman, Jeanette L, Heath, Travis S, Allareddy, Veerajalandhar, Rotta, Alexandre T
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 16-07-2024
• Subjects: CPAP; infants; children; noninvasive ventilation; pediatrics; respiratory failure; respiratory distress
• ISSN: 0020-1324; 1943-3654; 1943-3654
• DOI: 10.4187/respcare.11935

Respiratory failure in infants is a common reason for admission to the pediatric ICU (PICU). Although high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is the preferred first-line treatment at our institution, some infants require CPAP or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Here we report our experience using CPAP/NIV in infants < 10 kg.
We conducted a retrospective review of infants < 10 kg treated with CPAP/NIV in our PICUs between July 2017-May 2021 in the initial phase of treatment. Demographic, support type and settings, vital signs, pulse oximetry, and intubation data were extracted from the electronic health record. We compared subjects successfully treated with CPAP/NIV with those who required intubation.
We studied 62 subjects with median (interquartile range) age 96 [6.5-308] d and weight 4.5 (3.4-6.6) kg. Of these, 22 (35%) required intubation. There were no significant differences in demographics, medical history, primary interface, pre-CPAP/NIV support, and device used to deliver CPAP/NIV. HFNC was used in 57 (92%) subjects before escalation to CPAP/NIV. Subjects who failed CPAP/NIV were less likely to have bronchiolitis (27% vs 60%,
= .040), less likely to be discharged from the hospital to home (68% vs 93%,
= .02), had a longer median hospital length of stay (LOS) (26.9 [21-50.5] d vs 10.4 [5.6-28.4] d,
= .002), and longer median ICU LOS (14.6 [7.9-25.2] d vs 5.8 [3.8-12.4] d,
= .004). Initial vital signs and F
were similar, but S
was lower and F
higher at 6 h and 12 h after support initiation for subjects who failed CPAP/NIV. Initial CPAP/NIV settings were similar, but subjects who failed CPAP/NIV had higher maximum and final inspiratory/expiratory pressure.
Most infants who failed initial HFNC support were successfully managed without intubation using NIV or CPAP. Bronchiolitis was associated with a lower rate of CPAP/NIV failure, whereas lower S
and higher F
levels were associated with higher rates of intubation.