Implementation of near zero fluoroscopy in supraventricular tachycardia ablation procedures: a single center experience

• Published in: Europace (London, England) Vol. 26; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Lebreiro, A, Pestana, G, Madeira, M, Alves Pinto, R, Pinto, R, Araujo, P, Martins, C, Adao, L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 24-05-2024
• ISSN: 1099-5129; 1532-2092
• DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae102.777

Abstract
Background
Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) are common cardiac arrhythmias, and catheter ablation has proven to be a very effective treatment, but exposes patients and healthcare providers to radiation. "Near Zero Fluoroscopy" (NZF) techniques, utilizing advanced imaging, aim to reduce radiation exposure while maintaining efficacy.
Purpose
To present an analysis of near-zero fluoroscopy in SVT ablation procedures, in a tertiary center, since its implementation.
Methods
We prospectively enrolled 446 SVT-diagnosed patients for this study. All of them underwent NZF procedures using the same specific 3D mapping system, between January/19 and December/22. Patients with atrial fibrillation or macroreentrant atrial tachycardias or when a different mapping system was used, were excluded. All patients provided informed consent.
Results
Our population had 266 (60%) females and a median age of 39 (IQR 24-51) years.
AVNRT was the most frequent arrhythmia documented (229 cases, 51%), followed by Accessory Pathways (AP) (201 cases, 45%) and focal atrial tachycardia (AT) (16 cases, 4%). The ablation success rate was high (405/418, 97%). There was no ablation attempt in 12 patients (9 APs and 3 ATs) and the unsuccessful ablations (7/418 cases, 1,67%) were APs. Overall, fluoroscopy time was 1.1 minutes (IQR 0-2.6). There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of fluoroscopy time among the types of SVT based on the Kruskal-Wallis test (p 0.14).
Observing trends of fluoroscopy use through time, we acknowledge the presence of a learning curve, leading towards shorter times of X-ray during procedures along the first 3 years of implementation of a near-zero strategy. Median times (IQR) of fluoroscopy were as follows: 2019 – 2.25 (0.45-3.4) min; 2020 – 1 (0-2.5) min; 2021 – 0 (0-1.9) min; 2022 – 0.55 (03.05) min. (see BoxPlot) Pairwise comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with continuity correction revealed statistically significant differences in medians between all pairs of years, with p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method (p<0.01). In 2022, fluoroscopy time increased, when compared to 2021. We believe this finding can be explained by the fact that in 2022, our department received a new fellow and a young EP consultant (coming from a center where NZF was not the standard for SVT ablation), both being in the lab on a daily basis, explaining this upward trend in fluoroscopy time.
There were no acute complications requiring hospital admission or active treatment.
Conclusion
Our results emphasize the potential of near-zero fluoroscopy techniques to enhance safety and reduce radiation exposure while maintaining a high level of procedural efficacy in the treatment of SVT cases. Absence of acute complications highlighted the safety of these approaches.