P2477Assessment of intraventricular flow dynamics in acute heart failure studied by Vector Flow Mapping

Abstract Background Although left ventricular (LV) flow dynamics should be closely related to LV morphology and function, little is known about how heart failure (HF) changes it. Pathline Analysis (PA), a recently developed software based on Vector Flow Mapping (VFM, Hitachi), enables us to trace th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European heart journal Vol. 40; no. Supplement_1
Main Authors: Masuda, K, Minami, S, Stugaard, M, Kozuma, A, Takeda, S, Nakayama, T, Asanuma, T, Nakatani, S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 01-10-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Although left ventricular (LV) flow dynamics should be closely related to LV morphology and function, little is known about how heart failure (HF) changes it. Pathline Analysis (PA), a recently developed software based on Vector Flow Mapping (VFM, Hitachi), enables us to trace the virtual blood particles entering to the LV in diastole and being ejected in systole. We investigated the change of flow dynamics in HF induced in dogs using PA. Methods In 15 open-chest dogs, HF was induced by intracoronary injection of microspheres. Color Doppler images of apical long-axis view were acquired using Prosound F75 (Hitachi) before and after HF and were analyzed by PA. We calculated the ratio of the numbers of entering particles in diastole and ejected particles in systole (ejection rate) and the distance reached by the particles in diastole corrected by the LV long-axis diameter (propagation distance). Apical and basal short axis images were acquired using GE Vivid E9 and were analyzed for peak rotation and peak twist. Results After inducing HF, LV end-diastolic pressure increased from 6±2 to 15±5 mmHg (p<0.001) and ejection fraction (EF), apical peak rotation and peak twist decreased significantly (EF; 58±5 to 36±8%, apical peak rotation; 14±5 to 3±2 degree, peak twist; 19±5 to 6±3 degree, p<0.05, respectively). PA showed most of the entering particles to the LV were ejected in the following systole at the control stage, but in HF, a significant part of the entering particles were not ejected and remained in the LV (Figure). Ejection rate decreased from 50±11 to 26±11% (p<0.001) and the propagation distance decreased from 85±9 to 66±13% (p<0.001) after inducing HF. There were significant relationships between indices obtained by PA and EF and peak twist (Table). Conclusion A significant part of inflow is not ejected directly to the outflow in the next systole and remains in the LV in HF, suggesting inefficient flow dynamics.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0808