Key Factors for Predicting Appendicitis from Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Images Obtained Through Multiplanar Reconstruction

• Published in: Iranian journal of radiology Vol. 21; no. 2
• Main Authors: Chern, Jiun-Ying, Wong, Yon Cheong, Wang, Li Jen, Wu, Cheng Hsien, Chen, Huan Wu, Lin, Being Chuan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 13-10-2024
• ISSN: 1735-1065; 2008-2711
• DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol-146134

Background: The diameter of the appendix is a key parameter in diagnosing appendicitis. The diagnostic threshold for this parameter is 6 mm, originally established through graded compression sonography of the right lower quadrant (RLQ) of the abdomen. However, without corroborative findings from computed tomography (CT), this threshold may not be a reliable indicator of appendicitis. To ensure accurate diagnosis, clinicians should perform a comprehensive, multiparameter imaging assessment of the appendix, rather than relying solely on appendix diameter. Objectives: This study aimed to identify key factors for predicting appendicitis using contrast-enhanced coronal and sagittal CT images obtained through multiplanar reconstruction. Patients and Methods: This single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients who presented to our emergency department (ED) with RLQ abdominal pain and subsequently underwent contrast-enhanced CT between July 2019 and September 2020. The primary study outcome was pathologically confirmed appendicitis. Two experienced radiologists assessed parameters such as appendix diameter, wall thickness, abnormal appendix enhancement, abnormal appendix content, appendix erection, and periappendiceal fat stranding. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify significant predictive factors for appendicitis. Results: The study included 173 patients (median age: 37 years; women: 86). They were divided into appendicitis (n = 102) and alternative diagnosis (n = 71) groups. Significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of appendix diameter, wall thickness, wall enhancement, luminal content, appendix erection, and periappendiceal fat stranding (P < 0.001). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity values for an appendix diameter threshold of 7.7 mm were 91% and 82%, respectively. An appendix diameter of > 7.7 mm (OR: 15.3; P < 0.001), abnormal appendix enhancement (OR: 12.5; P < 0.001), and appendix erection (OR: 6.1; P = 0.004) emerged as significant independent predictors of appendicitis. Conclusion: An appendix diameter of 7.7 mm appears to be the optimal threshold for diagnosing appendicitis. Additionally, the detection of abnormal appendix enhancement and appendix erection on contrast-enhanced CT images holds considerable diagnostic value.