Risk and protective factors for child development: An observational South African birth cohort

• Published in: PLoS medicine Vol. 16; no. 9; p. e1002920
• Main Authors: Donald, Kirsten Ann, Wedderburn, Catherine J, Barnett, Whitney, Nhapi, Raymond T, Rehman, Andrea M, Stadler, Jacob A M, Hoffman, Nadia, Koen, Nastassja, Zar, Heather J, Stein, Dan J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 27-09-2019; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Age; Age Factors; Aggression; Analysis; Anemia; Babies; Biology and Life Sciences; Birth Weight; Care and treatment; Caregivers; Child Behavior; Child Development; Child health; Child, Preschool; Childhood; Children; Children & youth; Childrens health; Cognition; Councils; Developmental Disabilities - epidemiology; Developmental Disabilities - physiopathology; Developmental Disabilities - prevention & control; Developmental Disabilities - psychology; Domestic violence; Drinking (Alcoholic beverages); Early childhood education; Educational Status; Epidemiology; Families & family life; Female; Gender aspects; Gender differences; Gestation; Girls; Health aspects; HIV; HIV infections; Hospitals; Human immunodeficiency virus; Humans; Language; Low income groups; Male; Management; Maternal Health; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mental disorders; Mental health; Missing data; Neurosciences; Nutrition; People and Places; Population studies; Post traumatic stress disorder; Pregnancy; Pregnant women; Protective Factors; Psychiatry; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sex; Sex differences; Sex Factors; Smoking; Social aspects; Social class; Social Determinants of Health; Social Sciences; Socioeconomic data; Socioeconomic Factors; Socioeconomics; South Africa - epidemiology; Trauma; Violence; South Africa; Sub-Saharan Africa; United Kingdom > UK
• ISSN: 1549-1676; 1549-1277; 1549-1676
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002920

Approximately 250 million (43%) children under the age of 5 years in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are failing to meet their developmental potential. Risk factors are recognised to contribute to this loss of human potential. Expanding understanding of the risks that lead to poor outcomes and which protective factors contribute to resilience in children may be critical to improving disparities.
The Drakenstein Child Health Study is a population-based birth cohort in the Western Cape, South Africa. Pregnant women were enrolled between 20 and 28 weeks' gestation from two community clinics from 2012 to 2015; sociodemographic and psychosocial data were collected antenatally. Mothers and children were followed through birth until 2 years of age. Developmental assessments were conducted by trained assessors blinded to background, using the Bayley-III Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID-III), validated for use in South Africa, at 24 months of age. The study assessed all available children at 24 months; however, some children were not able to attend, because of loss to follow-up or unavailability of a caregiver or child at the correct age. Of 1,143 live births, 1,002 were in follow-up at 24 months, and a total of 734 children (73%) had developmental assessments, of which 354 (48.2%) were girls. This sample was characterised by low household employment (n = 183; 24.9%) and household income (n = 287; 39.1% earning <R1,000 per month), and high prevalence of maternal psychosocial risk factors including alcohol use in pregnancy (n = 95; 14.5%), smoking (n = 241; 34.7%), depression (n = 156; 23.7%), lifetime intimate partner violence (n = 310; 47.3%), and history of maternal childhood trauma (n = 228; 34.7%). A high proportion of children were categorised as delayed (defined by scoring < -1 standard deviation below the mean scaled score calculated using the BSID-III norms from a United States population) in different domains (369 [50.5%] cognition, 402 [55.6%] receptive language, 389 [55.4%] expressive language, 169 [23.2%] fine motor, and 267 [38.4%] gross motor). Four hundred five (55.3%) children had >1 domain affected, and 75 (10.2%) had delay in all domains. Bivariate and multivariable analyses revealed several factors that were associated with developmental outcomes. These included protective factors (maternal education, higher birth weight, and socioeconomic status) and risk factors (maternal anaemia in pregnancy, depression or lifetime intimate partner violence, and maternal HIV infection). Boys consistently performed worse than girls (in cognition [β = -0.74; 95% CI -1.46 to -0.03, p = 0.042], receptive language [β = -1.10; 95% CI -1.70 to -0.49, p < 0.001], expressive language [β = -1.65; 95% CI -2.46 to -0.84, p < 0.001], and fine motor [β = -0.70; 95% CI -1.20 to -0.20, p = 0.006] scales). There was evidence that child sex interacted with risk and protective factors including birth weight, maternal anaemia in pregnancy, and socioeconomic factors. Important limitations of the study include attrition of sample from birth to assessment age and missing data in some exposure areas from those assessed.
This study provides reliable developmental data from a sub-Saharan African setting in a well-characterised sample of mother-child dyads. Our findings highlight not only the important protective effects of maternal education, birth weight, and socioeconomic status for developmental outcomes but also sex differences in developmental outcomes and key risk and protective factors for each group.