Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery: A complex systematic review

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 13; no. 1; p. e0191161
• Main Authors: Naimi-Akbar, Aron, Hultin, Margareta, Klinge, Anna, Klinge, Björn, Tranæus, Sofia, Lund, Bodil
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 2018; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Antibiotic prophylaxis; Antibiotics; Bias; Biology and Life Sciences; Dentistry; Drug dosages; Drug resistance; Epidemiology; Health risks; Infections; Intravenous administration; Literature reviews; Maxillofacial surgery; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Meta-analysis; Multidisciplinary Sciences; Odontology; Orthognathic surgery; Physical Sciences; Postoperative complications; Postoperative infection; Prophylaxis; Quality assessment; Quality control; Research and Analysis Methods; Reviews; Risk assessment; Risk factors; Risk reduction; Statistical analysis; Studies; Surgeons; Surgery; Systematic review; Technology assessment; Transplants & implants; Sweden
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191161

In orthognathic surgery, antibiotics are prescribed to reduce the risk of postoperative infection. However, there is lack of consensus over the appropriate drug, the dose and duration of administration. The aim of this complex systematic review was to assess the effect of antibiotics on postoperative infections in orthognathic surgery.
Both systematic reviews and primary studies were assessed. Medline (OVID), The Cochrane Library (Wiley) and EMBASE (embase.com), PubMed (non-indexed articles) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publications were searched. The primary studies were assessed using GRADE and the systematic reviews by AMSTAR.
Screening of abstracts yielded 6 systematic reviews and 36 primary studies warranting full text scrutiny. In total,14 primary studies were assessed for risk of bias. Assessment of the included systematic reviews identified two studies with a moderate risk of bias, due to inclusion in the meta-analyses of primary studies with a high risk of bias. Quality assessment of the primary studies disclosed one with a moderate risk of bias and one with a low risk. The former compared a single dose of antibiotic with 24 hour prophylaxis using the same antibiotic; the latter compared oral and intravenous administration of antibiotics. Given the limited number of acceptable studies, no statistical analysis was undertaken, as it was unlikely to contribute any relevant information.
With respect to antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery, most of the studies to date have been poorly conducted and reported. Thus scientific uncertainty remains as to the preferred antibiotic and the optimal duration of administration.