The effects of empagliflozin on arterial stiffness, endothelial function and ventriculoarterial coupling in type 2 diabetes mellitus: 1 year follow up

Abstract Introduction Sodium glucose cotransporters inhibitors (SGLT2i) are currently used in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who pose high cardiovascular risk. However their effects on arterial stiffness, endothelial function and ventriculoarterial coupling have not b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European heart journal Vol. 41; no. Supplement_2
Main Authors: Ikonomidis, I, Thymis, J, Pavlidis, G, Birba, D, Kalogeris, A, Kousathana, F, Kostelli, G, Triantafyllou, C, Katogiannis, K, Lampadiari, V, Iliodromitis, E.K
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 01-11-2020
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction Sodium glucose cotransporters inhibitors (SGLT2i) are currently used in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who pose high cardiovascular risk. However their effects on arterial stiffness, endothelial function and ventriculoarterial coupling have not been described. Methods We recruited 120 patients with T2DM. They received either the SGLT2i empagliflozin (n=60) or insulin (n=60). We measured at baseline and after 1 year of treatment: 1) Perfused Boundary Region (PBR 5–25μm) to evaluate endothelial glycocalyx integrity via Glycocheck, 2) Pulse wave Velocity (PWVc-f), 3)central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), 4) central Pulse Pressure (cPP) via Complior,5) the ratio PWV/GLS by echocardiography to assess ventriculoarterial coupling (VA coupling). Results The patients were matched for age, gender, smoking, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (p=NS). Hemoglobin A1c was deteriorated in both groups (8.1% vs 8.2%, p=NS). The baseline measurements of aforementioned markers did not differ between the 2 groups (p=NS). PWV was correlated with cSBP (r=0.4.p<0.05) and cPP (r=0.35, p<0.05) for all participants at baseline. After 1 year of treatment both groups achieved significant reduction of HbA1c. Patients treated with insulin showed an increase of PWV in contrary with empagliflogin group (11.4±0.5 to 12.6±0.4 vs 11.7±0.5 to 10.9±0.4, correspondingly, p<0.05). cSBP declined considerably in empagliflozin group (135±10 to 129±10 vs 134±9 to 136±9 respectively, p<0.05) and cPP remained approximately steady (47±8 to 48±8 vs 49±6 to 55±6 respectively, p<0.05) compared with insulin group. PBR dropped in SGLT2i group (2.20±0.2 to 1.98±0.2, p<0.05) whereas PBR fluctuated at the same level in insulin group (2.18±0.2 to 2.15±0.3, p=NS).PWV/GLS fell in both groups but the reduction was more prominent in empagliflozin group (−0.72±0.1 to −0.67±0.1 vs −0.72±0.1 to −0.60±0.1 respectively, p<0.05). Conclusion 1 year treatment with empagliflozin resulted in improved markers of arterial stiffness, ventriculoarterial coupling and endothelial function, independently of glycemic control. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3354