Monitoring intervention coverage in the context of universal health coverage

• Published in: PLoS medicine Vol. 11; no. 9; p. e1001728
• Main Authors: Boerma, Ties, AbouZahr, Carla, Evans, David, Evans, Tim
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 01-09-2014; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Collection Review; Data collection; Delivery of Health Care - economics; Delivery of Health Care - trends; Health Information Systems - economics; Health Information Systems - trends; Health promotion; Health Promotion - economics; Health Promotion - trends; Health services; Humans; Information systems; Intervention; Laws, regulations and rules; Measurement techniques; Medical informatics; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mental health; National health insurance; Population; Public health; Quality of service; Rehabilitation; Universal Health Insurance - economics; Universal Health Insurance - trends; United States
• ISSN: 1549-1676; 1549-1277; 1549-1676
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001728

Monitoring universal health coverage (UHC) focuses on information on health intervention coverage and financial protection. This paper addresses monitoring intervention coverage, related to the full spectrum of UHC, including health promotion and disease prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and palliation. A comprehensive core set of indicators most relevant to the country situation should be monitored on a regular basis as part of health progress and systems performance assessment for all countries. UHC monitoring should be embedded in a broad results framework for the country health system, but focus on indicators related to the coverage of interventions that most directly reflect the results of UHC investments and strategies in each country. A set of tracer coverage indicators can be selected, divided into two groups-promotion/prevention, and treatment/care-as illustrated in this paper. Disaggregation of the indicators by the main equity stratifiers is critical to monitor progress in all population groups. Targets need to be set in accordance with baselines, historical rate of progress, and measurement considerations. Critical measurement gaps also exist, especially for treatment indicators, covering issues such as mental health, injuries, chronic conditions, surgical interventions, rehabilitation, and palliation. Consequently, further research and proxy indicators need to be used in the interim. Ideally, indicators should include a quality of intervention dimension. For some interventions, use of a single indicator is feasible, such as management of hypertension; but in many areas additional indicators are needed to capture quality of service provision. The monitoring of UHC has significant implications for health information systems. Major data gaps will need to be filled. At a minimum, countries will need to administer regular household health surveys with biological and clinical data collection. Countries will also need to improve the production of reliable, comprehensive, and timely health facility data. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.