An assessment of the measurement of phytoplankton respiration rates from dark 14 C incubations

Marra and Barber (2004) have proposed a simple procedure for calculating phytoplankton respiration from measurements of the loss of 14 C from the particulate fraction during dark post‐incubations. We identify the necessary assumptions implicit in their approach, the primary ones being: (1) the respi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Limnology and oceanography, methods Vol. 6; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
Main Authors: Williams, Peter J. le B., Lefèvre, Dominique
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 01-01-2008
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Marra and Barber (2004) have proposed a simple procedure for calculating phytoplankton respiration from measurements of the loss of 14 C from the particulate fraction during dark post‐incubations. We identify the necessary assumptions implicit in their approach, the primary ones being: (1) the respiration rates in the light must be the same as those in the dark, (2) the specific radioactivity ( 14 C/ 12 C) of the respiratory CO 2 released in the dark must be known or assumed to be the same as the seawater carbonate, and (3) only phytoplankton respiration gives rise to the change in the 14 C content of the particulate fraction in the dark. In most cases, with a combination of theory and observations, we have been able to make a first order quantitative assessment of the error associated with these assumptions and their consequences. When P/R ratios are ≥3, we conclude that uncertainties deriving from the necessary assumption that specific activity of the CO 2 produced is the same as that of the labeled seawater bicarbonate, give rise to underestimates of respiration in the region of 5%–20%. The errors due to loss of 14 C from the particulate fraction, other than phytoplankton respiration, will give overestimates as high as 20–40%. At P/R ratios >3, the non‐photosynthetic assimilation of CO 2 will give insignificant errors. The above generalizations will not hold when photosynthetic rates are low both in absolute terms and in relation to respiration.
ISSN:1541-5856
1541-5856
DOI:10.4319/lom.2008.6.1