global meta‐analysis of the relative extent of intraspecific trait variation in plant communities
Recent studies have shown that accounting for intraspecific trait variation (ITV) may better address major questions in community ecology. However, a general picture of the relative extent of ITV compared to interspecific trait variation in plant communities is still missing. Here, we conducted a me...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology letters Vol. 18; no. 12; pp. 1406 - 1419 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Blackwell Science
01-12-2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Recent studies have shown that accounting for intraspecific trait variation (ITV) may better address major questions in community ecology. However, a general picture of the relative extent of ITV compared to interspecific trait variation in plant communities is still missing. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis of the relative extent of ITV within and among plant communities worldwide, using a data set encompassing 629 communities (plots) and 36 functional traits. Overall, ITV accounted for 25% of the total trait variation within communities and 32% of the total trait variation among communities on average. The relative extent of ITV tended to be greater for whole‐plant (e.g. plant height) vs. organ‐level traits and for leaf chemical (e.g. leaf N and P concentration) vs. leaf morphological (e.g. leaf area and thickness) traits. The relative amount of ITV decreased with increasing species richness and spatial extent, but did not vary with plant growth form or climate. These results highlight global patterns in the relative importance of ITV in plant communities, providing practical guidelines for when researchers should include ITV in trait‐based community and ecosystem studies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12508 Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Swiss National Science Foundation - No. PA00P3_136474; No. PZ00P3_148261 Sao Paulo Research Foundation - No. 2013/50169-1; No. 2014/06453-0 New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment core Funding CNPq-Brazil - No. 479083/2008-8; No. 141451/2011-4; No. 306573/2009-1; No. 303534/2012-5; No. 303714/2010-7 Discovery Grants from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship - No. DGE-1247399 istex:2CC3DC2606B7CA77A4FD46F41325C28F4C07965E Government of Ecuador University of Aarhus of Denmark Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship - No. 221060 JSPS European Social Fund and Czech State Budget ArticleID:ELE12508 NSF - No. DEB-03089 European Research Council (ERC) - No. ERC-StG-2014-639706-CONSTRAINTS; No. FP7/2007-2013 CAPES-Brazil - No. BEX 7913/13-3; No. PNPD #1454013 Chilean Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT) - No. 1120171 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute ark:/67375/WNG-NPTC0MNR-7 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 1461-023X 1461-0248 1461-0248 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ele.12508 |