Supercoiling Effects on Short-Range DNA Looping in E. coli

DNA-protein loops can be essential for gene regulation. The Escherichia coli lactose (lac) operon is controlled by DNA-protein loops that have been studied for decades. Here we adapt this model to test the hypothesis that negative superhelical strain facilitates the formation of short-range (6-8 DNA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 11; no. 10; p. e0165306
Main Authors: Mogil, Lauren S, Becker, Nicole A, Maher, 3rd, L James
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 26-10-2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:DNA-protein loops can be essential for gene regulation. The Escherichia coli lactose (lac) operon is controlled by DNA-protein loops that have been studied for decades. Here we adapt this model to test the hypothesis that negative superhelical strain facilitates the formation of short-range (6-8 DNA turns) repression loops in E. coli. The natural negative superhelicity of E. coli DNA is regulated by the interplay of gyrase and topoisomerase enzymes, adding or removing negative supercoils, respectively. Here, we measured quantitatively DNA looping in three different E. coli strains characterized by different levels of global supercoiling: wild type, gyrase mutant (gyrB226), and topoisomerase mutant (ΔtopA10). DNA looping in each strain was measured by assaying repression of the endogenous lac operon, and repression of ten reporter constructs with DNA loop sizes between 70-85 base pairs. Our data are most simply interpreted as supporting the hypothesis that negative supercoiling facilitates gene repression by small DNA-protein loops in living bacteria.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceptualization: LM NB LJM. Data curation: LM NB. Formal analysis: LM NB LJM. Funding acquisition: LJM. Methodology: LM NB LJM. Project administration: LJM. Resources: LM NB. Supervision: LJM. Validation: LM NB. Visualization: LM NB LJM. Writing – original draft: LM. Writing – review & editing: LM NB LJM.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0165306