A search for modifying genetic factors in CHEK2:c.1100delC breast cancer patients
The risk of breast cancer associated with CHEK2: c.1100delC is 2–threefold but higher in carriers with a family history of breast cancer than without, suggesting that other genetic loci in combination with CHEK2 :c.1100delC confer an increased risk in a polygenic model. Part of the excess familial r...
Saved in:
Published in: | Scientific reports Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 14763 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
20-07-2021
Nature Publishing Group Nature Portfolio |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The risk of breast cancer associated with
CHEK2:
c.1100delC is 2–threefold but higher in carriers with a family history of breast cancer than without, suggesting that other genetic loci in combination with
CHEK2
:c.1100delC confer an increased risk in a polygenic model. Part of the excess familial risk has been associated with common low-penetrance variants. This study aimed to identify genetic loci that modify
CHEK2
:c.1100delC-associated breast cancer risk by searching for candidate risk alleles that are overrepresented in
CHEK2
:c.1100delC carriers with breast cancer compared with controls. We performed whole-exome sequencing in 28 breast cancer cases with germline
CHEK2
:c.1100delC, 28 familial breast cancer cases and 70 controls. Candidate alleles were selected for validation in larger cohorts. One recessive synonymous variant, rs16897117, was suggested, but no overrepresentation of homozygous
CHEK2
:c.1100delC carriers was found in the following validation. Furthermore, 11 non-synonymous candidate alleles were suggested for further testing, but no significant difference in allele frequency could be detected in the validation in
CHEK2
:c.1100delC cases compared with familial breast cancer, sporadic breast cancer and controls. With this method, we found no support for a
CHEK2
:c.1100delC-specific genetic modifier. Further studies of
CHEK2
:c.1100delC genetic modifiers are warranted to improve risk assessment in clinical practice. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-021-93926-x |