Information aggregation and communication in committees

In this paper, we attempt to explain the underlying strategic incentives confronting individuals when they must make a collective decision over a set of alternatives and each has information that is decision-relevant for others. A significant literature has emerged in formal political theory over th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences Vol. 364; no. 1518; pp. 763 - 769
Main Authors: Austen-Smith, David, Feddersen, Timothy J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London The Royal Society 27-03-2009
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper, we attempt to explain the underlying strategic incentives confronting individuals when they must make a collective decision over a set of alternatives and each has information that is decision-relevant for others. A significant literature has emerged in formal political theory over the past several years that focuses on such problems, paying particular attention, first, to the extent to which voting can be expected to aggregate committee members' information and, second, to the role of communication among committee members prior to voting. Inter alia, this literature reveals a surprisingly subtle interaction between the voting rules used to make decisions and the incentives for committee members to share information prior to voting.
Bibliography:istex:612C291584378D545E9083D24B870B86830D2DF4
ark:/67375/V84-1HRK9ZCZ-S
ArticleID:rstb20080256
href:763.pdf
Theme Issue 'Group decision making in humans and animals' compiled by Larissa Conradt and Christian List
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0962-8436
1471-2970
DOI:10.1098/rstb.2008.0256