Laparoscopic hysterectomy in large uteri: Experience from a tertiary care hospital in B angladesh

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for uteri weighing more than 500 g as compared to uteri weighing less than 500 g in benign gynecological diseases. Methods This was a retrospective study. Patie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Asian journal of endoscopic surgery Vol. 8; no. 3; pp. 323 - 327
Main Authors: Jahan, Samsad, Jahan, Akter, Joarder, Mahjabin, Habib, Samira Humaira, Sharmin, Farzana, Nayer, Reefat
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 01-08-2015
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for uteri weighing more than 500 g as compared to uteri weighing less than 500 g in benign gynecological diseases. Methods This was a retrospective study. Patients were admitted through the outpatient department. They were divided into two groups: uterine weight ≥500 g (group 1) and uterine weight >500 g (group 2). There were no exclusion criteria based on the size, number, or location of leiomyomas. The patient characteristics for the two groups were compared in terms of demographic and socioeconomic details, operating time, amount of blood loss, requirement of blood transfusion, need for analgesia, and length of hospital stay. Results The characteristics age and BMI were well balanced between the two groups. Uterine weight was 267.2 ± 97.6 g in group 1 and 740.0 ± 371.4 g in group 2 ( P  < 0.001). Length of operation and amount of blood loss were greater in group 2 than in group 1 (operation: 89.1 ± 26.7 vs 73.3 ± 24.6 min, P  < 0.01; blood loss: 570.5 ± 503.6 vs 262.5 ± 270.0 mL, P  < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in hospital stay or incidence of operative complications between the two groups. No patients were switched from laparoscopy to laparotomy during operation. The rate of blood transfusion was lower in group1 than in group 2 (4.9% vs 32.6%; P  < 0.001). Conclusion This study demonstrated that despite the increased operating time and blood loss, laparoscopy should be considered instead of laparotomy in cases of large uteri. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy can be performed safely for a large uterus.
ISSN:1758-5902
1758-5910
DOI:10.1111/ases.12184