The time-course of visual categorizations: you spot the animal faster than the bird

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 4; no. 6; p. e5927
• Main Authors: Macé, Marc J-M, Joubert, Olivier R, Nespoulous, Jean-Luc, Fabre-Thorpe, Michèle
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 17-06-2009; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adult; Animal cognition; Animals; Attention; BASIC (programming language); Birds; Brain; Classification; Cognition; Comparative analysis; Concept Formation; Decision analysis; Discrimination Learning; Distributed processing; Dogs; Experiments; Female; Furniture; Humans; Life Sciences; Male; Middle Aged; Neurons and Cognition; Neuroscience; Neuroscience/Animal Cognition; Neuroscience/Behavioral Neuroscience; Neuroscience/Cognitive Neuroscience; Neuroscience/Experimental Psychology; Neuroscience/Natural and Synthetic Vision; Neuroscience/Psychology; Neuroscience/Sensory Systems; Nontarget organisms; Pattern Recognition, Visual; Reaction Time; Reaction time task; Semantics; Trends; Visual Perception; Visual system; Visual tasks; France
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005927

Since the pioneering study by Rosch and colleagues in the 70s, it is commonly agreed that basic level perceptual categories (dog, chair...) are accessed faster than superordinate ones (animal, furniture...). Nevertheless, the speed at which objects presented in natural images can be processed in a rapid go/no-go visual superordinate categorization task has challenged this "basic level advantage".
Using the same task, we compared human processing speed when categorizing natural scenes as containing either an animal (superordinate level), or a specific animal (bird or dog, basic level). Human subjects require an additional 40-65 ms to decide whether an animal is a bird or a dog and most errors are induced by non-target animals. Indeed, processing time is tightly linked with the type of non-targets objects. Without any exemplar of the same superordinate category to ignore, the basic level category is accessed as fast as the superordinate category, whereas the presence of animal non-targets induces both an increase in reaction time and a decrease in accuracy.
These results support the parallel distributed processing theory (PDP) and might reconciliate controversial studies recently published. The visual system can quickly access a coarse/abstract visual representation that allows fast decision for superordinate categorization of objects but additional time-consuming visual analysis would be necessary for a decision at the basic level based on more detailed representations.