Cooperation Is Not Enough—Exploring Social-Ecological Micro-Foundations for Sustainable Common-Pool Resource Use [corrected]

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 11; no. 8; p. e0157796
• Main Authors: Schill, Caroline, Wijermans, Nanda, Schlüter, Maja, Lindahl, Therese
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 24-08-2016; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Analysis; Biology and Life Sciences; Communication; Community; Computer and Information Sciences; Cooperation; Ecological effects; Ecological monitoring; Ecological succession; Ecology and Environmental Sciences; Ecosystems; Educational aspects; Environmental aspects; Environmental management; Environmental sustainability; Experimental research; Experiments; Exploitation; Fisheries; Influence; Knowledge; Observational learning; Physical Sciences; Research and Analysis Methods; Resource management; Social aspects; Social discrimination learning; Social Sciences; Studies; Sustainability Science; Sustainable development; Sustainable use; Uncertainty; vetenskap om hållbar utveckling; United States
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157796

Cooperation amongst resource users holds the key to overcoming the social dilemma that characterizes community-based common-pool resource management. But is cooperation alone enough to achieve sustainable resource use? The short answer is no. Developing management strategies in a complex social-ecological environment also requires ecological knowledge and approaches to deal with perceived environmental uncertainty. Recent behavioral experimental research indicates variation in the degree to which a group of users can identify a sustainable exploitation level. In this paper, we identify social-ecological micro-foundations that facilitate cooperative sustainable common-pool resource use. We do so by using an agent-based model (ABM) that is informed by behavioral common-pool resource experiments. In these experiments, groups that cooperate do not necessarily manage the resource sustainably, but also over- or underexploit. By reproducing the patterns of the behavioral experiments in a qualitative way, the ABM represents a social-ecological explanation for the experimental observations. We find that the ecological knowledge of each group member cannot sufficiently explain the relationship between cooperation and sustainable resource use. Instead, the development of a sustainable exploitation level depends on the distribution of ecological knowledge among the group members, their influence on each other's knowledge, and the environmental uncertainty the individuals perceive. The study provides insights about critical social-ecological micro-foundations underpinning collective action and sustainable resource management. These insights may inform policy-making, but also point to future research needs regarding the mechanisms of social learning, the development of shared management strategies and the interplay of social and ecological uncertainty.