Biased diversity metrics revealed by bacterial 16S pyrotags derived from different primer sets

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 8; no. 1; p. e53649
• Main Authors: Cai, Lin, Ye, Lin, Tong, Amy Hin Yan, Lok, Si, Zhang, Tong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 14-01-2013; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Activated sludge; Analysis; Bacteria; Bacteria - classification; Bacteria - genetics; Biology; Biosphere; Biotechnology; Civil engineering; Cluster Analysis; Design; DNA Primers - metabolism; Genes; Genetic Variation; Health sciences; Laboratories; Microbial activity; Microorganisms; Odorant receptors; Open systems; Primers; Relative abundance; Researchers; RNA; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics; rRNA 16S; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Sequences; Sludge; Studies; Taxonomy; Temperature; Water treatment; China
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053649

In recent years, PCR-based pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes has continuously increased our understanding of complex microbial communities in various environments of the Earth. However, there is always concern on the potential biases of diversity determination using different 16S rRNA gene primer sets and covered regions. Here, we first report how bacterial 16S rRNA gene pyrotags derived from a series of different primer sets resulted in the biased diversity metrics. In total, 14 types of pyrotags were obtained from two-end pyrosequencing of 7 amplicon pools generated by 7 primer sets paired by 1 of 4 forward primers (V1F, V3F, V5F, and V7F) and 1 of 4 reverse primers (V2R, V4R, V6R, and V9R), respectively. The results revealed that: i) the activated sludge exhibited a large bacterial diversity that represented a broad range of bacterial populations and served as a good sample in this methodology research; ii) diversity metrics highly depended on the selected primer sets and covered regions; iii) paired pyrotags obtained from two-end pyrosequencing of each short amplicon displayed different diversity metrics; iv) relative abundance analysis indicated the sequencing depth affected the determination of rare bacteria but not abundant bacteria; v) the primer set of V1F and V2R significantly underestimated the diversity of activated sludge; and vi) the primer set of V3F and V4R was highly recommended for future studies due to its advantages over other primer sets. All of these findings highlight the significance of this methodology research and offer a valuable reference for peer researchers working on microbial diversity determination.