The Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Pelvic Floor Muscles in Chronic Pelvic Pain Patients: A Double‐Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) injections versus placebo injections, combined with pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT), in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Design Randomised, double‐blinded clinical trial (January 2020–April 2023). S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Main Authors: Spruijt, Melle A., Klerkx, Wenche M., Notten, Kim, van Eijndhoven, Hugo, Speksnijder, Leonie, Kerkhof, Manon H., Kuivers, Kirsten B.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 13-11-2024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) injections versus placebo injections, combined with pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT), in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Design Randomised, double‐blinded clinical trial (January 2020–April 2023). Setting This multicentre study was conducted at four hospitals in the Netherlands. Population and Sample Ninety‐four women with CPP and increased pelvic floor muscle tone despite previous PFMT, were enrolled. Methods Participants received either BTA injections (100 units) or placebo injections into the pelvic floor muscle, followed by four PFMT sessions. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes included the number of women with at least a 33% reduction in pain and those reporting (very) much improvement of their pain. Secondary outcomes covered quality of life and pelvic floor function. Follow‐up visits were scheduled at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks post‐treatment. Mixed models for repeated measurements were used for analysis. Results A 33% reduction or more in average pain score was reported by 15 participants (33%) after BTA treatment and 9 participants (20%) after placebo treatment (odd ratio placebo/BTA 1.88; 95% CI 0.72–4.90, p = 0.19). In both groups, 8 women (17%) reported their improvement as (very) much better (odd ratio placebo/BTA 0.947; 95% CI 0.32–2.80, p = 0.92). Pelvic floor resting activity decreased significantly after BTA treatment compared to placebo ( p = 0.001). Conclusion The results from this study do not support the use of BTA injections in the management of CPP in women.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17991