Magnetic resonance imaging of the newborn brain: automatic segmentation of brain images into 50 anatomical regions
We studied methods for the automatic segmentation of neonatal and developing brain images into 50 anatomical regions, utilizing a new set of manually segmented magnetic resonance (MR) images from 5 term-born and 15 preterm infants imaged at term corrected age called ALBERTs. Two methods were compare...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one Vol. 8; no. 4; p. e59990 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Public Library of Science
02-04-2013
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We studied methods for the automatic segmentation of neonatal and developing brain images into 50 anatomical regions, utilizing a new set of manually segmented magnetic resonance (MR) images from 5 term-born and 15 preterm infants imaged at term corrected age called ALBERTs. Two methods were compared: individual registrations with label propagation and fusion; and template based registration with propagation of a maximum probability neonatal ALBERT (MPNA). In both cases we evaluated the performance of different neonatal atlases and MPNA, and the approaches were compared with the manual segmentations by means of the Dice overlap coefficient. Dice values, averaged across regions, were 0.81±0.02 using label propagation and fusion for the preterm population, and 0.81±0.02 using the single registration of a MPNA for the term population. Segmentations of 36 further unsegmented target images of developing brains yielded visibly high-quality results. This registration approach allows the rapid construction of automatically labeled age-specific brain atlases for neonates and the developing brain. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 PMCID: PMC3615077 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content: ISG AH SJC LS RAH DR ADE. Conceived and designed the experiments: ISG. Performed the experiments: ISG. Analyzed the data: ISG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ISG AH SJC LS MAR RAH JVH DR ADE. Wrote the paper: ISG. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0059990 |