Limited Generalizability of Registration Trials in Hepatitis C: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Approval of drugs in chronic hepatitis C is supported by registration trials. These trials might have limited generalizability through use of strict eligibility criteria. We compared effectiveness and safety of real world hepatitis C patients eligible and ineligible for registration trials. We perfo...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one Vol. 11; no. 9; p. e0161821 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Public Library of Science
06-09-2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Approval of drugs in chronic hepatitis C is supported by registration trials. These trials might have limited generalizability through use of strict eligibility criteria. We compared effectiveness and safety of real world hepatitis C patients eligible and ineligible for registration trials.
We performed a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of chronic hepatitis C patients treated in the real world. We applied a combined set of inclusion and exclusion criteria of registration trials to our cohort to determine eligibility. We compared effectiveness and safety in eligible vs. ineligible patients, and performed sensitivity analyses with strict criteria. Further, we used log binomial regression to assess relative risks of criteria on outcomes.
In this cohort (n = 467) 47% of patients would have been ineligible for registration trials. Main exclusion criteria were related to hepatic decompensation and co-morbidity (cardiac disease, anemia, malignancy and neutropenia), and were associated with an increased risk for serious adverse events (RR 1.45-2.31). Ineligible patients developed significantly more serious adverse events than eligible patients (27% vs. 11%, p< 0.001). Effectiveness was decreased if strict criteria were used.
Nearly half of real world hepatitis C patients would have been excluded from registration trials, and these patients are at increased risk to develop serious adverse events. Hepatic decompensation and co-morbidity were important exclusion criteria, and were related to toxicity. Therefore, new drugs should also be studied in these patients, to genuinely assess benefits and risk of therapy in the real world population. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: F. Berden: no conflict; R. de Knegt has served as a an advisory board member for Gilead, Janssen, BMS, AbbVie, Roche and Norgine, and has received research funding from Janssen, BMS, AbbVie, and Roche; H. Blokzijl: no conflict; S. Kuiken: no conflict; K. van Erpecum has served as an HCV advisory board member for AbbVie, BMS, Gilead and Janssen Cilag, and as a consultant for AbbVie, and has received research funding from Janssen Cilag, Gilead, and AbbVie; S. Willemse has served as a speaker and an advisory board member for AbbVie, Gilead, BMS, Merck, Roche, Janssen, and has received research funding from AbbVie, Gilead, Merck/MSD, and Roche; J. den Hollander: no conflict; M. van Vonderen: no conflict; P. Friederich: no conflict; B. van Hoek has served as a an advisory board member for Gilead, Merck, AbbVie, Norgine, Falk, and Janssen; C. van Nieuwkerk: no conflict; J. Drenth has served as a an advisory board member for Gilead, Janssen, BMS, and AbbVie, and has received research funding from Janssen, AbbVie (this study), dr. Falk, Ipsen, Novartis, Zambon, and Merck; Dr. Kievit: no conflict. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and material. Conceptualization: FACB JPHD WK. Data curation: FACB WK. Formal analysis: FACB WK. Funding acquisition: JPHD. Investigation: FACB. Methodology: FACB JPHD WK. Project administration: FACB. Resources: FACB RJdK HB SDK KJLvE SBW JdH MGAvV PF BvH CMJvN JPHD. Supervision: JPHD WK. Validation: FACB WK. Writing – original draft: FACB WK JPHD. Writing – review & editing: FACB RJdK HB SDK KJLvE SBW JdH MGAvV PF BvH CMJvN JPHD WK. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0161821 |