Work Interventions Within Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programs (IPRP) - Frequency, Patient Characteristics, and Association with Self-Rated Work Ability

• Published in: Journal of pain research Vol. 16; pp. 421 - 436
• Main Authors: Svanholm, Frida, Björk, Mathilda, Löfgren, Monika, Gerdle, Björn, Hedevik, Henrik, Molander, Peter
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 01-01-2023; Taylor & Francis Ltd; Dove; Dove Medical Press
• Subjects: Back pain; Care and treatment; Chronic pain; Collaboration; Compensation; Education; Interdisciplinary aspects; Intervention; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Mental disorders; Mental health; Musculoskeletal diseases; Original Research; Pain; Participation; Patients; Primary care; Quality of life; Questionnaires; Rehabilitation; Sick leave; Stakeholders; work interventions; Sweden; chronic pain; rehabilitation; work interventions
• ISSN: 1178-7090; 1178-7090
• DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S390747

Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs (IPRPs) help people with chronic pain improve their health and manage their work; however, the way IPRPs address sick leave could be improved. Although work interventions can be a part of IPRP, it is not well known how and to what extent.
This study explores the frequency of work interventions and the characteristics of patients who participate in work interventions as part of IPRP at specialist pain rehabilitation departments in Sweden. In addition, this study explores the association between participation in work interventions and change in patients' self-rated work ability after IPRP.
Data from the Swedish quality registry for pain rehabilitation (SQRP), which includes 3809 patients between 2016 and 2018, were analysed with descriptive statistics and regression analyses.
The results indicate a high participation rate in work interventions (90%). Some differences were evident concerning characteristics of patients who participated in different work interventions. The return-to-work (RTW) plan, the most frequently used work intervention, had the strongest association with change in self-rated work ability after IPRP. However, the effect sizes were small, and the initial score best explained the change. Furthermore, there were differences between employed and unemployed patients and employment had a positive association with change in self-rated work ability.
More research is needed to understand IPRP's mechanisms and work interventions to support patients with chronic pain, reduce sick leave, and manage work. Employment status needs to be considered and interventions should be tailored to match the individual needs.