Why Warfare? Lessons from the Past
Most political scientists and historians who consider the reasons for warfare start with the modern era, or even the iSoos; fewer go back to the ancient Greeks. Discerning whether or not human warfare has a genetic base, for instance, is an impossible task to accomplish with such limited scope; inst...
Saved in:
Published in: | Daedalus (Cambridge, Mass.) Vol. 136; no. 1; pp. 13 - 21 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA
The MIT Press
22-12-2007
MIT Press American Academy of Arts and Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Most political scientists and historians who consider the reasons for warfare start with the modern era, or even the iSoos; fewer go back to the ancient Greeks. Discerning whether or not human warfare has a genetic base, for instance, is an impossible task to accomplish with such limited scope; instead, we must examine evidence from deep history and worldwide ethnography, which represent most of human history and most of human cultural variability. For example, archaeological evidence now shows that the SaIishian tribes of the Plateau area of western North America, who had no remembered history of warfare when studied by anthropologists in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, had had significant warfare a few centuries earlier. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Winter, 2007 |
ISSN: | 0011-5266 1548-6192 |
DOI: | 10.1162/daed.2007.136.1.13 |