Why Warfare? Lessons from the Past

Most political scientists and historians who consider the reasons for warfare start with the modern era, or even the iSoos; fewer go back to the ancient Greeks. Discerning whether or not human warfare has a genetic base, for instance, is an impossible task to accomplish with such limited scope; inst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Daedalus (Cambridge, Mass.) Vol. 136; no. 1; pp. 13 - 21
Main Author: LeBlanc, Steven A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA The MIT Press 22-12-2007
MIT Press
American Academy of Arts and Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Most political scientists and historians who consider the reasons for warfare start with the modern era, or even the iSoos; fewer go back to the ancient Greeks. Discerning whether or not human warfare has a genetic base, for instance, is an impossible task to accomplish with such limited scope; instead, we must examine evidence from deep history and worldwide ethnography, which represent most of human history and most of human cultural variability. For example, archaeological evidence now shows that the SaIishian tribes of the Plateau area of western North America, who had no remembered history of warfare when studied by anthropologists in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, had had significant warfare a few centuries earlier.
Bibliography:Winter, 2007
ISSN:0011-5266
1548-6192
DOI:10.1162/daed.2007.136.1.13