Adjunctive Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Infrabony Regenerative Treatment: A Systematic Review and RCT’s Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Stem cells international Vol. 2018; no. 2018; pp. 1 - 10
• Main Authors: Almasri, Maher, Pustina-Krasniqi, Teuta, Georgakopoulos, Ioannis, Zahid, Faisal Maqbool, Pisani, Flavio, Saleem, Mubashir, Xhajanka, Edit
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Publishing Corporation 01-01-2018; Hindawi; John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Hindawi Limited
• Subjects: Biological products; Biomaterials; Biomedical materials; Blood; Blood coagulation; Bone biomaterials; Clinical trials; Comparative analysis; Defects; Enamel; Grafts; Growth factors; Heterogeneity; Meta-analysis; Periodontics; Plasma; Platelets; Quality assessment; Quality control; Recession; Reduction; Regeneration; Review; Studies; Substitute bone; Surgery; Surgical implants; Surgical instruments; Systematic review; Tissue engineering; Web portals
• ISSN: 1687-966X; 1687-9678; 1687-9678
• DOI: 10.1155/2018/9594235

Background and Objective. The purpose of this study was to highlight the clinical performance of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) used as an adjunctive tool for regeneration in infrabony periodontal defects using different biomaterials or performing different surgical flap approaches. Comparative evaluation of main clinical outcomes as probing pocket depth reduction, clinical attachment gain, and recession reduction with and without the use of PRP has been analysed. Materials and Methods. According to the focused question, an electronic and hand searching has been performed up to December 2016. From a batch of 73 articles, the selection strategy and Jadad quality assessment led us to include 15 studies for the meta-analysis. Results. Despite the high heterogeneity found and the lack of complete data regarding the selected clinical outcomes, a comparative analysis has been possible by the categorization of used biomaterials and surgical flap approaches. This method led us to observe the best performance of grafts with the use of adjunctive PRP in CAL gain and PPD reduction. No difference has been outlined with a specific surgical flap. Conclusions. Although PRP is considered a cheap and patient’s derived growth factor, the not conclusive data reported would suggest that its use in addition to bone substitutes could be of some clinical benefit in the regenerative treatment of infrabony defects. Clinical Relevance. This systematic review was intended to sort out the huge controversial debate in the field about the possible use of PRP in regenerative surgery in infrabony defect. The clinical relevance of using blood-borne growth factors to conventional procedures is effective as these could determine a better performance and outcomes despite the surgical approach adopted and limit the use of additional biomaterials for the blood clot stabilization.