Articulatory correlates of phonemic and coarticulatory nasalization

Phonological theory distinguishes nasal and oral vowel counterparts by velopharyngeal port opening, neglecting other phonetic differences between phonemic and coarticulatory nasalization. Recent articulatory work provides evidence of oropharyngeal distinctions, in addition to velic lowering. This st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol. 142; no. 4; p. 2552
Main Authors: Barlaz, Marissa, Liang, Zhi-Pei, Sutton, Brad
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 01-10-2017
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Phonological theory distinguishes nasal and oral vowel counterparts by velopharyngeal port opening, neglecting other phonetic differences between phonemic and coarticulatory nasalization. Recent articulatory work provides evidence of oropharyngeal distinctions, in addition to velic lowering. This study (12 Brazilian Portuguese speakers) uses real-time MRI to investigate oropharyngeal differences between oral, phonemically nasal, and phonetically nasalized vowels /a, i, u/. Tissue boundaries in midsagittal vocal tract images were automatically detected to reveal each vowel repetition’s aperture function. Principal Components Analysis determined vocal tract regions responsible for the greatest variance in the data. Time-dynamic analyses of vocal tract area in these regions used smoothing spline ANOVA. Results show the tongue body and/or hyperpharynx as the most important articulators. For /a/, nasal vowels demonstrate wider hyperpharyngeal and narrower tongue body regions compared to oral vowels. For /u/, oral vowels show wider hyperpharyngeal and narrower tongue body regions. For /i/, nasal vowels demonstrate wider tongue body and narrower hyperpharyngeal regions. Nasalized vowels manifest apertures intermediate between oral and nasal vowels for /a/ and /u/, and similar to oral vowels for /i/. Results are largely in line with expected acoustic effects of nasalization, and demonstrate that phonetic differences exist between phonemic and coarticulatory nasalization.
ISSN:0001-4966
1520-8524
DOI:10.1121/1.5014329