Performance of Abbreviated Breast MRI in High-Risk Patients in a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center

Abstract Introduction The development of abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) protocols reduce scan times. This paper reports the performance of AB-MRI at a tertiary care public academic medical center in comparison with established literature. Methods This HIPAA-compliant IRB-approved retrospective stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of breast imaging
Main Authors: Zaza, Tamara, Chandora, Kapil, Yalniz, Ceren, Zamora, Kathryn Watts, Zalasin, Stefanie, Li, Yufeng, Woodard, Stefanie
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 14-11-2024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction The development of abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) protocols reduce scan times. This paper reports the performance of AB-MRI at a tertiary care public academic medical center in comparison with established literature. Methods This HIPAA-compliant IRB-approved retrospective study reviewed 413 AB-MRI screenings in high-risk patients from June 2020 to March 2023. Data were collected from 3 databases (MagView, Cerner PowerChart, and Prism Primordial). Demographics and overall BI-RADS assessment were recorded. For all positive (BI-RADS 0, 3, 4, 5) examinations, manual review of each case was performed. Performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, cancer detection rate [CDR], recall rate, positive predictive value [PPV] 3 and negative predictive value [NPV]) were calculated. PubMed and Google Scholar were used to review similar AB-MRI studies to compare performance metrics. Results There were 413 AB-MRI examinations from 413 unique patients. The majority of cases were audit-negative BI-RADS 1 or 2 (83.8%, 346/413). There were 67 (16.2%, 67/413) audit-positive cases with 3.6% (15/413) BI-RADS 3, 10.9% (45/413) BI-RADS 4, 0.7% (3/413) BI-RADS 5, and 1.0% (4/413) BI-RADS 0. Performance metrics showed a sensitivity of 100.0% (95% CI, 63.1%-100.0%) and a specificity of 85.7% (95% CI, 81.9%-88.9%). The PPV3 was 14.3% (95% CI, 5.1%-23.5%), and the NPV was 100.0% (95% CI, 99.0%-100.0%). The CDR was 19.4 per 1000 screenings. The results are comparable to prior literature and benchmark data. Conclusion This study demonstrates high sensitivity (100.0%) and NPV (100.0%) of AB-MRI with comparable specificity (85.7%) and CDR (19.4/1000) to the literature, adding support to the use of AB-MRI. Further research is needed to optimize AB-MRI protocols.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2631-6110
2631-6129
2631-6129
DOI:10.1093/jbi/wbae071