Clinical practice of childhood apraxia of speech in Hong Kong: A web-based survey study

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 18; no. 4; p. e0284109
• Main Authors: Wong, Eddy C H, Wong, Min N, Velleman, Shelley L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 07-04-2023; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Accuracy; Apraxia; Apraxias - diagnosis; Apraxias - therapy; Biology and Life Sciences; Cantonese; Child; Children; Chinese languages; Clinical competence; Clinical medicine; Cognitive ability; Diagnosis; Diagnostic tests; Evidence-based medicine; Hong Kong; Humans; Imitation; Internet; Language; Language skills; Medicine and Health Sciences; Pediatrics; People and places; Polls & surveys; Skills; Social Sciences; Speaking; Speech; Speech Disorders - diagnosis; Speech Disorders - therapy; Speech perception; Speech therapists; Speech-language pathologists; Speech-Language Pathology - methods; Surveys; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tonal languages; Hong Kong; United Kingdom; Hong Kong China; China
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284109

A survey study on clinical practice not only provides insight into the implementation of knowledge, but also informs future investigations. There is a limited understanding of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) in Cantonese speakers. This study examined the clinical practice of CAS in Hong Kong and discussed future directions of research for better evidence-based practice.
Qualified Hong Kong pediatric speech-language pathologists (SLPs) completed the online questionnaire, which had a total of 48 questions regarding their knowledge of and experience with CAS in Cantonese speakers, including assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.
Seventy-seven responses were received from Hong Kong SLPs. Most of the SLPs (83.2%) rated their understanding of CAS as either "a little" or "fair". About half (53.2%) of the respondents had worked with children with CAS. No standardized assessment or objective/quantitative measures were used clinically. Instead, seven assessment tasks, including imitation of polysyllabic words and speech and language samples were used commonly. Perceptual judgment of clinical features is still the most popular approach for diagnosis, with a variety of lists in use. Of concern was that, in addition to using some evidence-based approaches, local SLPs treated CAS using approaches that have limited evidence, in the context of less treatment frequency, targeting both speech and language skills within the same session, and with only partial implementation of the approaches.
The results suggest that the understanding of CAS among local SLPs requires attention. One reason for this is that evidence regarding the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of Cantonese speakers with CAS is still limited. Future investigations are needed.