The relationship between a plant-based diet and mental health: Evidence from a cross-sectional multicentric community trial (LIPOKAP study)

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 18; no. 5; p. e0284446
• Main Authors: Haghighatdoost, Fahimeh, Mahdavi, Atena, Mohammadifard, Noushin, Hassannejad, Razieh, Najafi, Farid, Farshidi, Hossein, Lotfizadeh, Masoud, Kazemi, Tooba, Karimi, Simin, Roohafza, Hamidreza, Silveira, Erika Aparecida, Sarrafzadegan, Nizal, de Oliveira, Cesar
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 31-05-2023; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adult; Analysis; Anxiety; Biology and Life Sciences; Cross-Sectional Studies; Depression, Mental; Diet; Diet therapy; Diet, Vegetarian - adverse effects; Exercise; Fertilizer industry; Food intake; Health aspects; Health insurance; Health risks; Humans; Iran - epidemiology; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mental depression; Mental disorders; Mental Health; Neuroprotection; Physical activity; Plant-based foods; Prevention; Risk; Risk factors; Social Sciences; Testing; Variance analysis; Vegetarianism; Iran
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284446

Dietary patterns emphasizing plant foods might be neuroprotective and exert health benefits on mental health. However, there is a paucity of evidence on the association between a plant-based dietary index and mental health measures.
This study sought to examine the association between plant-based dietary indices, depression and anxiety in a large multicentric sample of Iranian adults.
This cross-sectional study was performed in a sample of 2,033 participants. A validated food frequency questionnaire was used to evaluate dietary intakes of participants. Three versions of PDI including an overall PDI, a healthy PDI (hPDI), and an unhealthy PDI (uPDI) were created. The presence of anxiety and depression was examined via a validated Iranian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
PDI and hPDI were not associated to depression and anxiety after adjustment for potential covariates (age, sex, energy, marital status, physical activity level and smoking). However, in the crude model, the highest consumption of uPDI approximately doubled the risk of depression (OR= 2.07, 95% CI: 1.49, 2.87; P<0.0001) and increased the risk of anxiety by almost 50% (OR= 1.56, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.14; P= 0.001). Adjustment for potential confounders just slightly changed the associations (OR for depression in the fourth quartile= 1.96; 95% CI: 1.34, 2.85, and OR for anxiety in the fourth quartile= 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07, 2.19).
An unhealthy plant-based dietary index is associated with a higher risk of depression and anxiety, while plant-based dietary index and healthy plant-based dietary index were not associated to depression and anxiety.