Suggested deafness during hypnosis and simulation of hypnosis compared to a distraction and control condition: A study on subjective experience and cortical brain responses

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 15; no. 10; p. e0240832
• Main Authors: Franz, Marcel, Schmidt, Barbara, Hecht, Holger, Naumann, Ewald, Miltner, Wolfgang H R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 29-10-2020; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Acoustic Stimulation; Adolescent; Adult; Amplitudes; Attention; Attention - physiology; Auditory discrimination; Auditory evoked potentials; Auditory Perception; Auditory stimuli; Behavior - physiology; Brain; Brain - diagnostic imaging; Brain - physiology; Brain - physiopathology; Brain research; Central auditory processing; Cerebral cortex; Cognition & reasoning; Cognition - physiology; Comparative analysis; Deafness; Deafness - diagnostic imaging; Deafness - etiology; Deafness - physiopathology; Electroencephalography - methods; Event-related potentials; Evoked Potentials - physiology; Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology; Female; Hearing - physiology; Hearing protectors; Humans; Hypnosis; Hypnosis - methods; Information processing; Localization; Loudness; Male; Methods; Middle Aged; Perception; Psychological aspects; Psychological research; Response time; Schiller, Johann Christoph Friedrich von (1759-1805); Simulation; Speech Perception - physiology; Stimuli (Psychology); Young Adult; Germany
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240832

Hypnosis is a powerful tool to affect the processing and perception of stimuli. Here, we investigated the effects of hypnosis on the processing of auditory stimuli, the time course of event-related-potentials (ERP; N1 and P3b amplitudes) and the activity of cortical sources of the P3b component. Forty-eight participants completed an auditory oddball paradigm composed of standard, distractor, and target stimuli during a hypnosis (HYP), a simulation of hypnosis (SIM), a distraction (DIS), and a control (CON) condition. During HYP, participants were suggested that an earplug would obstruct the perception of tones and during SIM they should pretend being hypnotized and obstructed to hear the tones. During DIS, participants' attention was withdrawn from the tones by focusing participants' attention onto a film. In each condition, subjects were asked to press a key whenever a target stimulus was presented. Behavioral data show that target hit rates and response time became significantly reduced during HYP and SIM and loudness ratings of tones were only reduced during HYP. Distraction from stimuli by the film was less effective in reducing target hit rate and tone loudness. Although, the N1 amplitude was not affected by the experimental conditions, the P3b amplitude was significantly reduced in HYP and SIM compared to CON and DIS. In addition, source localization results indicate that only a small number of neural sources organize the differences of tone processing between the control condition and the distraction, hypnosis, and simulation of hypnosis conditions. These sources belong to brain areas that control the focus of attention, the discrimination of auditory stimuli, and the organization of behavioral responses to targets. Our data confirm that deafness suggestions significantly change auditory processing and perception but complete deafness is hard to achieve during HYP. Therefore, the term 'deafness' may be misleading and should better be replaced by 'hypoacusis'.