Community impacts of Prosopis juliflora invasion: biogeographic and congeneric comparisons

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 7; no. 9; p. e44966
• Main Authors: Kaur, Rajwant, Gonzáles, Wilfredo L, Llambi, Luis Daniel, Soriano, Pascual J, Callaway, Ragan M, Rout, Marnie E, Gallaher, Timothy J, Inderjit
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 12-09-2012; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Agriculture; Allelopathy; Analysis; Biodiversity; Biogeography; Biological evolution; Biology; Canopies; Centaurea; Ecology; Ecosystem; Ecosystems; Environmental management; Environmental studies; Gene expression; Geography; Hawaii; India; Introduced species; Invasive plants; Invasive species; Leachates; Leaves; Litter; Native species; Nonnative species; Peru; Phenols - metabolism; Phosphorus; Phosphorus - metabolism; Plant Leaves - growth & development; Plant Leaves - metabolism; Plant Roots - growth & development; Plant Roots - metabolism; Population Density; Population Dynamics; Potassium; Prosopis; Prosopis - classification; Prosopis - growth & development; Prosopis - metabolism; Prosopis cineraria; Prosopis juliflora; Rhizosphere; Salts; Salts - metabolism; Soil - analysis; Species diversity; Species richness; Species Specificity; Trajectories; Trends; Tryptophan; United States; Venezuela; Middle East; South America; Venezuela; Montana; United States > US; Africa; Hawaii; India
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044966

We coordinated biogeographical comparisons of the impacts of an exotic invasive tree in its native and non-native ranges with a congeneric comparison in the non-native range. Prosopis juliflora is taxonomically complicated and with P. pallida forms the P. juliflora complex. Thus we sampled P. juliflora in its native Venezuela, and also located two field sites in Peru, the native range of Prosopis pallida. Canopies of Prosopis juliflora, a native of the New World but an invader in many other regions, had facilitative effects on the diversity of other species in its native Venezuela, and P. pallida had both negative and positive effects depending on the year, (overall neutral effects) in its native Peru. However, in India and Hawaii, USA, where P. juliflora is an aggressive invader, canopy effects were consistently and strongly negative on species richness. Prosopis cineraria, a native to India, had much weaker effects on species richness in India than P. juliflora. We carried out multiple congeneric comparisons between P. juliflora and P. cineraria, and found that soil from the rhizosphere of P. juliflora had higher extractable phosphorus, soluble salts and total phenolics than P. cineraria rhizosphere soils. Experimentally applied P. juliflora litter caused far greater mortality of native Indian species than litter from P. cineraria. Prosopis juliflora leaf leachate had neutral to negative effects on root growth of three common crop species of north-west India whereas P. cineraria leaf leachate had positive effects. Prosopis juliflora leaf leachate also had higher concentrations of total phenolics and L-tryptophan than P. cineraria, suggesting a potential allelopathic mechanism for the congeneric differences. Our results also suggest the possibility of regional evolutionary trajectories among competitors and that recent mixing of species from different trajectories has the potential to disrupt evolved interactions among native species.