Measuring Poverty in Southern India: A Comparison of Socio-Economic Scales Evaluated against Childhood Stunting

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 11; no. 8; p. e0160706
• Main Authors: Kattula, Deepthi, Venugopal, Srinivasan, Velusamy, Vasanthakumar, Sarkar, Rajiv, Jiang, Victoria, S, Mahasampath Gowri, Henry, Ankita, Deosaran, Jordanna Devi, Muliyil, Jayaprakash, Kang, Gagandeep
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 04-08-2016; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Age; Balances (scales); Birth rate; Child; Child, Preschool; Children; Children & youth; Data collection; Demographic aspects; Demographics; Deprivation; Developing countries; Economics; Education; Female; Government aid; Growth Disorders - diagnosis; Growth Disorders - epidemiology; Health disparities; Health policy; Households; Humans; India - epidemiology; Inequality; Infant; Infant mortality; LDCs; Living conditions; Logistic Models; Male; Malnutrition; Medicine and Health Sciences; Nutrition; Odds Ratio; People and Places; Population; Poverty; Poverty - classification; Public health; Social Class; Social Sciences; Socioeconomic factors; Socioeconomics; Surveys and Questionnaires; Teaching methods; India; United States > US; Georgia
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160706

Socioeconomic status (SES) scales measure poverty, wealth and economic inequality in a population to guide appropriate economic and public health policies. Measurement of poverty and comparison of material deprivation across nations is a challenge. This study compared four SES scales which have been used locally and internationally and evaluated them against childhood stunting, used as an indicator of chronic deprivation, in urban southern India.
A door-to-door survey collected information on socio-demographic indicators such as education, occupation, assets, income and living conditions in a semi-urban slum area in Vellore, Tamil Nadu in southern India. A total of 7925 households were categorized by four SES scales-Kuppuswamy scale, Below Poverty Line scale (BPL), the modified Kuppuswamy scale, and the multidimensional poverty index (MDPI) and the level of agreement compared between scales. Logistic regression was used to test the association of SES scales with stunting.
The Kuppuswamy, BPL, MDPI and modified Kuppuswamy scales classified 7.1%, 1%, 5.5%, and 55.3% of families as low SES respectively, indicating conservative estimation of low SES by the BPL and MDPI scales in comparison with the modified Kuppuswamy scale, which had the highest sensitivity (89%). Children from low SES classified by all scales had higher odds of stunting, but the level of agreement between scales was very poor ranging from 1%-15%.
There is great non-uniformity between existing SES scales and cautious interpretation of SES scales is needed in the context of social, cultural, and economic realities.