Bats of a gender flock together: sexual segregation in a subtropical bat

Competition has long been assumed to be a major driver in regulating ecological communities. Intra-specific competition is considered to be maximal as members of the same species use the same ecological niches in a similar way. Many species of animals exhibit great physiological, behavioral, and mor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 8; no. 2; p. e54987
Main Authors: Levin, Eran, Roll, Uri, Dolev, Amit, Yom-Tov, Yoram, Kronfeld-Shcor, Noga
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 18-02-2013
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Competition has long been assumed to be a major driver in regulating ecological communities. Intra-specific competition is considered to be maximal as members of the same species use the same ecological niches in a similar way. Many species of animals exhibit great physiological, behavioral, and morphological differences between sexes (sexual dimorphism). Here we report an extreme geographical segregation between the sexes in the greater mouse-tailed bat (Rhinopoma microphyllum). To gain insight into the driving mechanisms of sexual segregation outside the mating season, we collected and integrated environmental, behavioral, physiological, and spatial information. We found that both sexes choose roosts with similar characteristics and the same food type, but use different habitats for different durations. Males forage around cliffs at higher and cooler elevations while females forage in lowlands around a river delta. We suggest that it is their different physiological and social needs, and not competition, that drives sexual segregation in this species.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: EL YY-T NK-S. Performed the experiments: EL. Analyzed the data: EL AD UR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AD. Wrote the paper: EL UR NK-S YY-T.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0054987