Is microaggression an oxymoron? A mixed methods study on attitudes toward racial microaggressions among United States university students

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 15; no. 12; p. e0243058
• Main Authors: Lui, P Priscilla, Berkley, Shalanda R, Pham, Savannah, Sanders, Lauren
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 02-12-2020; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: African Americans; Aggression - psychology; Analysis; Appraisals; Asian Americans; Attitude; Attitudes; Behavior; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes; Biology and Life Sciences; College students; Continental Population Groups - psychology; Discrimination; Empirical analysis; Female; Health aspects; Hispanic Americans; Humans; Individual differences; Male; Microaggressions; Minority & ethnic groups; Mixed methods research; People and places; Prejudice; Psychology; Public health; Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Race; Racial differences; Racism; Racism - psychology; Ratings; Receivers; Semantic differential; Social aspects; Social exclusion; Social Sciences; Student attitudes; Students - psychology; Taxonomy; United States; Universities; University students; White people; United States; United States > US; Texas
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243058

To best understand the possible negative health and social consequences associated with racial microaggression, in-depth understanding of how people judge these events is needed. People of Color (POC) and White participants (N = 64) were recruited for a mixed-methods study that incorporated quantitative attitude ratings and focus group interviews. Participants read and discussed their attitudes toward five vignettes that reflected microassault, microinsult, and microinvalidation scenarios. Semantic differential ratings showed that participants judged microassaults to be most unacceptable, followed by microinsults and then microinvalidations. Using a grounded theory approach, our qualitative analysis of interview data revealed five thematic categories. First, participants judged receivers' psychological harm to be a critical consideration for their attitudes toward microaggression scenarios; they discussed factors associated with individual differences in appraisals, prior exposures to discrimination, and sensitivity to race. Second, participants were less consistent in their opinion about the role of the deliverers' intent on their judgment of microaggressions; many considered microaggression events to be results of deliverers' cultural ignorance and racial insensitivity. Third, our analysis revealed the central importance of contexts that shaped participants' attitudes toward microaggression. Fourth, participants also discussed the notion that receivers of microaggression were racist for calling attention to race issues. Finally, POC participants tended to relate to the vignettes and use their lived experiences to contextualize their opinions about racial microaggression. The current results raise concerns regarding the conceptualization and utility of the word "microaggression," especially within the broader contexts of racism and major discrimination. Other empirical and practical implications are discussed.