The Influence of Mark-Recapture Sampling Effort on Estimates of Rock Lobster Survival

Five annual capture-mark-recapture surveys on Jasus edwardsii were used to evaluate the effect of sample size and fishing effort on the precision of estimated survival probability. Datasets of different numbers of individual lobsters (ranging from 200 to 1,000 lobsters) were created by random subsam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 11; no. 3; p. e0151683
Main Authors: Kordjazi, Ziya, Frusher, Stewart, Buxton, Colin, Gardner, Caleb, Bird, Tomas
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 18-03-2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Five annual capture-mark-recapture surveys on Jasus edwardsii were used to evaluate the effect of sample size and fishing effort on the precision of estimated survival probability. Datasets of different numbers of individual lobsters (ranging from 200 to 1,000 lobsters) were created by random subsampling from each annual survey. This process of random subsampling was also used to create 12 datasets of different levels of effort based on three levels of the number of traps (15, 30 and 50 traps per day) and four levels of the number of sampling-days (2, 4, 6 and 7 days). The most parsimonious Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) model for estimating survival probability shifted from a constant model towards sex-dependent models with increasing sample size and effort. A sample of 500 lobsters or 50 traps used on four consecutive sampling-days was required for obtaining precise survival estimations for males and females, separately. Reduced sampling effort of 30 traps over four sampling days was sufficient if a survival estimate for both sexes combined was sufficient for management of the fishery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: SF ZK. Performed the experiments: ZK. Analyzed the data: ZK TB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SF CB CG. Wrote the paper: ZK SF CB CG TB.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0151683