Comparison of Self-report − Based and Physical Performance − Based Frailty Definitions Among Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis

Background A well-accepted definition of frailty includes measurements of physical performance, which may limit its clinical utility. Study Design In a cross-sectional study, we compared prevalence and patient characteristics based on a frailty definition that uses self-reported function to the clas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of kidney diseases Vol. 64; no. 4; pp. 600 - 607
Main Authors: Johansen, Kirsten L., MD, Dalrymple, Lorien S., MD, MPH, Delgado, Cynthia, MD, Kaysen, George A., MD, PhD, Kornak, John, PhD, Grimes, Barbara, PhD, Chertow, Glenn M., MD, MPH
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-10-2014
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background A well-accepted definition of frailty includes measurements of physical performance, which may limit its clinical utility. Study Design In a cross-sectional study, we compared prevalence and patient characteristics based on a frailty definition that uses self-reported function to the classic performance-based definition and developed a modified self-report−based definition. Setting & Participants Prevalent adult patients receiving hemodialysis in 14 centers around San Francisco and Atlanta in 2009-2011. Index Tests Self-report−based frailty definition in which a score lower than 75 on the Physical Function scale of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was substituted for gait speed and grip strength in the classic definition; modified self-report definition with optimized Physical Function score cutoff points derived in a development (one-half) cohort and validated in the other half. Reference Test Performance-based frailty defined as 3 of the following: weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, low physical activity, and slow gait speed. Results 387 (53%) patients were frail based on self-reported function, of whom 209 (29% of the cohort) met the performance-based definition. Only 23 (3%) met the performance-based definition of frailty only. The self-report definition had 90% sensitivity, 64% specificity, 54% positive predictive value, 93% negative predictive value, and 72.5% overall accuracy. Intracellular water per kilogram of body weight and serum albumin, prealbumin, and creatinine levels were highest among nonfrail individuals, intermediate among those who were frail by self-report, and lowest among those who also were frail by performance. Age, percentage of body fat, and C-reactive protein level followed an opposite pattern. The modified self-report definition had better accuracy (84%; 95% CI, 79%-89%) and superior specificity (88%) and positive predictive value (67%). Limitations Our study did not address prediction of outcomes. Conclusions Patients who meet the self-report–based but not the performance-based definition of frailty may represent an intermediate phenotype. A modified self-report definition can improve the accuracy of a questionnaire-based method of defining frailty.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0272-6386
1523-6838
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.03.016