Second-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer: Data from the Spanish AGAMENON registry

Second-line treatments boost overall survival in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, there is a paucity of information as to patterns of use and the results achieved in actual clinical practice. The study population comprised patients with AGC in the AGAMENON registry who had received second-lin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 15; no. 7; p. e0235848
Main Authors: Cotes Sanchís, Almudena, Gallego, Javier, Hernandez, Raquel, Arrazubi, Virginia, Custodio, Ana, Cano, Juana María, Aguado, Gema, Macias, Ismael, Lopez, Carlos, López, Flora, Visa, Laura, Garrido, Marcelo, Martínez Lago, Nieves, Fernández Montes, Ana, Limón, María Luisa, Azkárate, Aitor, Pimentel, Paola, Reguera, Pablo, Ramchandani, Avinash, Cacho, Juan Diego, Martín Carnicero, Alfonso, Granja, Mónica, Martín Richard, Marta, Hernández Pérez, Carolina, Hurtado, Alicia, Serra, Olbia, Buxo, Elvira, Vidal Tocino, Rosario, Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula, Carmona-Bayonas, Alberto, Buyukhatipoglu, Hakan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: San Francisco Public Library of Science 31-07-2020
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Second-line treatments boost overall survival in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, there is a paucity of information as to patterns of use and the results achieved in actual clinical practice. The study population comprised patients with AGC in the AGAMENON registry who had received second-line. The objective was to describe the pattern of second-line therapies administered, progression-free survival following second-line (PFS-2), and post-progression survival since first-line (PPS). 2311 cases with 2066 progression events since first-line (89.3%) were recorded; 245 (10.6%) patients died during first-line treatment and 1326/2066 (64.1%) received a second-line. Median PFS-2 and PPS were 3.1 (95% CI, 2.9-3.3) and 5.8 months (5.5-6.3), respectively. The most widely used strategies were monoCT (56.9%), polyCT (15.0%), ramucirumab+CT (12.6%), platinum-reintroduction (8.3%), trastuzumab+CT (6.1%), and ramucirumab (1.1%). PFS-2/PPS medians gradually increased in monoCT, 2.6/5.1 months; polyCT 3.4/6.3 months; ramucirumab+CT, 4.1/6.5 months; platinum-reintroduction, 4.2/6.7 months, and for the HER2+ subgroup in particular, trastuzumab+CT, 5.2/11.7 months. Correlation between PFS since first-line and OS was moderate in the series as a whole (Kendall's [tau] = 0.613), lower in those subjects who received second-line (Kendall's [tau] = 0.539), especially with ramucirumab+CT (Kendall's [tau] = 0.413). This analysis reveals the diversity in second-line treatment for AGC, highlighting the effectiveness of paclitaxel-ramucirumab and, for a selected subgroup of patients, platinum reintroduction; both strategies endorsed by recent clinical guidelines.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: Dr. Javier Gallego declares advisory role for Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck, Roche, Servier, and travel grants from Novartis, Amgen. No other authors have competing interests to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0235848