Fragile Convergence: Understanding Variation in the Enforcement of China's Industrial Pollution Law
Official statistics and independent survey data show that in the last decade China has witnessed a remarkable change in its enforcement of environmental pollution violations, moving toward more formalistic and coercive law enforcement with more enforcement cases as well as higher fines. The data als...
Saved in:
Published in: | Law & policy Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 14 - 37 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01-01-2010
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Official statistics and independent survey data show that in the last decade China has witnessed a remarkable change in its enforcement of environmental pollution violations, moving toward more formalistic and coercive law enforcement with more enforcement cases as well as higher fines. The data also show that there is considerable regional variation with coastal areas having more and higher punishments than those inland. This article explores these findings, seeking to understand the explanation and meaning of these temporal and regional variation patterns. The study shows how enforcement varies when there is a convergence of governmental, social, and economic institutional forces. The article argues that the basis for such convergence has been fragile, as national pressures have lacked consistency and local community and government support evaporates when dominant sources of income are at stake. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-SKSJZ919-N ArticleID:LAPO309 istex:E18D509864A5B7565E42888FFEE1DC199BF3FB42 The research for this article is partially funded by the project “Cross‐Border Environmental Protection between Hong Kong and Guangdong Province” of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project Account Code: 1‐BB05). Van Rooij carried out this research while working at the Van Vollenhoven Institute, Faculty of Law of Leiden University. The authors would like to thank Lesley K. McAllister, Robert A. Kagan, and the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the earlier version of the article. ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0265-8240 1467-9930 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2009.00309.x |