COX2 expression in prognosis and in prediction to endocrine therapy in early breast cancer patients

In breast cancer, the prognostic impact of COX2 expression varies widely between studies. We examined the prognostic value of COX2 expression in a large cohort of breast cancer patients treated with primary surgery between 1985 and 1994 and explained the variable results of COX2 expression found in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Breast cancer research and treatment Vol. 125; no. 3; pp. 671 - 685
Main Authors: van Nes, Johanna G. H, de Kruijf, Esther M, Faratian, Dana, van de Velde, Cornelis J. H, Putter, Hein, Falconer, Claire, Smit, Vincent T. H. B. M, Kay, Charlene, van de Vijver, Marc J, Kuppen, Peter J. K, Bartlett, John M. S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Boston Boston : Springer US 01-02-2011
Springer US
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Springer Verlag
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In breast cancer, the prognostic impact of COX2 expression varies widely between studies. We examined the prognostic value of COX2 expression in a large cohort of breast cancer patients treated with primary surgery between 1985 and 1994 and explained the variable results of COX2 expression found in the literature. A tissue microarray was constructed of available tumour material, and ER, PgR, HER2, Ki67 and COX2 were examined by immunohistochemistry. Median follow-up was 19 years. Fifty-five percent (n = 369/677) of patients received no systemic treatment. COX2 was scored using a weighted histoscore. Analysis of COX2 expression in two groups based on the median (148; below vs. above) showed an increased hazard ratio (HR) of 1.35 (95% CI 1.05-1.75, P = 0.021) for disease-free survival (DFS) and of 1.39 (95% CI 1.03-1.82, P = 0.016) for overall survival (OS). However, COX2 did not remain independent in multivariate analysis. In patients with hormone receptor positive tumours, COX2 expression had a negative influence on outcome (low vs. high: DFS: HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07-1.76, P = 0.013). This effect disappeared when endocrine therapy was administered (low vs. high: DFS: HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.51-1.70, P = 0.811) while it remained statistically significant when endocrine therapy was omitted (low vs. high: DFS: HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.12-1.94, P = 0.005). Our results show that COX2 plays a role in hormonal pathways. Our results can explain the results found in previously published studies.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0854-7
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-6806
1573-7217
DOI:10.1007/s10549-010-0854-7