The Impact of State Medical Marijuana Legislation on Adolescent Marijuana Use

Abstract Purpose The state-level legalization of medical marijuana has raised concerns about increased accessibility and appeal of the drug to youth. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of medical marijuana legalization across the United States by comparing trends in adolescent mari...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of adolescent health Vol. 55; no. 2; pp. 160 - 166
Main Authors: Choo, Esther K., M.D., M.P.H, Benz, Madeline, Zaller, Nikolas, Ph.D, Warren, Otis, M.D, Rising, Kristin L., M.D, McConnell, K. John, Ph.D
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-08-2014
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Purpose The state-level legalization of medical marijuana has raised concerns about increased accessibility and appeal of the drug to youth. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of medical marijuana legalization across the United States by comparing trends in adolescent marijuana use between states with and without legalization of medical marijuana. Methods The study utilized data from the Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance Survey between 1991 and 2011. States with a medical marijuana law for which at least two cycles of Youth Risk Behavioral Surveillance data were available before and after the implementation of the law were selected for analysis. Each of these states was paired with a state in geographic proximity that had not implemented the law. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare characteristics between states with and without medical marijuana use policies. A difference-in-difference regression was performed to control for time-invariant factors relating to drug use in each state, isolating the policy effect, and then calculated the marginal probabilities of policy change on the binary dependent variable. Results The estimation sample was 11,703,100 students. Across years and states, past-month marijuana use was common (20.9%, 95% confidence interval 20.3–21.4). There were no statistically significant differences in marijuana use before and after policy change for any state pairing. In the regression analysis, we did not find an overall increased probability of marijuana use related to the policy change (marginal probability .007, 95% confidence interval −.007, .02). Conclusions This study did not find increases in adolescent marijuana use related to legalization of medical marijuana.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1054-139X
1879-1972
DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.02.018