Cytochrome b divergence between avian sister species is linked to generation length and body mass

It is increasingly realised that the molecular clock does not tick at a constant rate. Rather, mitochondrial mutation rates are influenced by factors such as generation length and body mass. This has implications for the use of genetic data in species delimitation. It could be that speciation, as re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 9; no. 2; p. e85006
Main Authors: Thomson, Caroline E, Gilbert, James D J, Brooke, M de L
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 05-02-2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It is increasingly realised that the molecular clock does not tick at a constant rate. Rather, mitochondrial mutation rates are influenced by factors such as generation length and body mass. This has implications for the use of genetic data in species delimitation. It could be that speciation, as recognised by avian taxonomists, is associated with a certain minimum genetic distance between sister taxa, in which case we would predict no difference in the cytochrome b divergence of sister taxa according to the species' body size or generation time. Alternatively, if what taxonomists recognise as speciation has tended to be associated with the passage of a minimum amount of time since divergence, then there might be less genetic divergence between sister taxa with slower mutation rates, namely those that are heavier and/or with longer generation times. After excluding non-flying species, we analysed a database of over 600 avian sister species pairs, and found that species pairs with longer generation lengths (which tend to be the larger species) showed less cytochrome b divergence. This finding cautions against using any simple unitary criterion of genetic divergence to delimit species.
Bibliography:Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: CET MdeLB. Performed the experiments: CET. Analyzed the data: CET. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JDJG. Wrote the paper: CET JDJG MdeLB.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0085006