Ablation Lesion Assessment with MRI

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI is capable of detecting not only native cardiac fibrosis, but also ablation-induced scarring. Thus, it offers the unique opportunity to assess ablation lesions non-invasively. In the atrium, LGE-MRI has been shown to accurately detect and localise gaps in ablati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review Vol. 11; p. e02
Main Authors: Mont, Lluís, Roca-Luque, Ivo, Althoff, Till F
Format: Journal Article Book Review
Language:English
Published: England Radcliffe Group Ltd 01-04-2022
Radcliffe Medical Education Ltd
Radcliffe Cardiology
Radcliffe Medical Media
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI is capable of detecting not only native cardiac fibrosis, but also ablation-induced scarring. Thus, it offers the unique opportunity to assess ablation lesions non-invasively. In the atrium, LGE-MRI has been shown to accurately detect and localise gaps in ablation lines. With a negative predictive value close to 100% it can reliably rule out pulmonary vein reconnection non-invasively and thus may avoid unnecessary invasive repeat procedures where a pulmonary vein isolation only approach is pursued. Even LGE-MRI-guided repeat pulmonary vein isolation has been demonstrated to be feasible as a standalone approach. LGE-MRI-based lesion assessment may also be of value to evaluate the efficacy of ventricular ablation. In this respect, the elimination of LGE-MRI-detected arrhythmogenic substrate may serve as a potential endpoint, but validation in clinical studies is lacking. Despite holding great promise, the widespread use of LGE-MRI is still limited by the absence of standardised protocols for image acquisition and post-processing. In particular, reproducibility across different centres is impeded by inconsistent thresholds and internal references to define fibrosis. Thus, uniform methodological and analytical standards are warranted to foster a broader implementation in clinical practice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Disclosure: LM has received honoraria as a lecturer and consultant and research grants from Abbott Medical, Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific and Medtronic; and is a shareholder of Galgo Medical. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
ISSN:2050-3369
2050-3377
DOI:10.15420/aer.2021.63