Influence of rapid malaria diagnostic tests on treatment and health outcome in fever patients, Zanzibar: a crossover validation study

The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for Plasmodium falciparum malaria is being suggested to improve diagnostic efficiency in peripheral health care settings in Africa. Such improved diagnostics are critical to minimize overuse and thereby delay development of resistance to artemisinin-based com...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS medicine Vol. 6; no. 4; p. e1000070
Main Authors: Msellem, Mwinyi I, Mårtensson, Andreas, Rotllant, Guida, Bhattarai, Achuyt, Strömberg, Johan, Kahigwa, Elizeus, Garcia, Montse, Petzold, Max, Olumese, Peter, Ali, Abdullah, Björkman, Anders
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 28-04-2009
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for Plasmodium falciparum malaria is being suggested to improve diagnostic efficiency in peripheral health care settings in Africa. Such improved diagnostics are critical to minimize overuse and thereby delay development of resistance to artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs). Our objective was to study the influence of RDT-aided malaria diagnosis on drug prescriptions, health outcomes, and costs in primary health care settings. We conducted a cross-over validation clinical trial in four primary health care units in Zanzibar. Patients of all ages with reported fever in the previous 48 hours were eligible and allocated alternate weeks to RDT-aided malaria diagnosis or symptom-based clinical diagnosis (CD) alone. Follow-up was 14 days. ACT was to be prescribed to patients diagnosed with malaria in both groups. Statistical analyses with multilevel modelling were performed. A total of 1,887 patients were enrolled February through August 2005. RDT was associated with lower prescription rates of antimalarial treatment than CD alone, 361/1005 (36%) compared with 752/882 (85%) (odds ratio [OR] 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.05, p<0.001). Prescriptions of antibiotics were higher after RDT than CD alone, i.e., 372/1005 (37%) and 235/882 (27%) (OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.5-2.2, p<0.001), respectively. Reattendance due to perceived unsuccessful clinical cure was lower after RDT 25/1005 (2.5%), than CD alone 43/882 (4.9%) (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.005). Total average cost per patient was similar: USD 2.47 and 2.37 after RDT and CD alone, respectively. RDTs resulted in improved adequate treatment and health outcomes without increased cost per patient. RDTs may represent a tool for improved management of patients with fever in peripheral health care settings. (Clinicaltrials.gov) NCT00549003.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ICMJE criteria for authorship read and met: MIM AM GR AB JS EK MG MP PO AA AB. Agree with the manuscript's results and conclusions: MIM AM GR AB JS EK MG MP PO AA AB. Designed the experiments/the study: MIM GR AB JS EK AA AB. Analyzed the data: GR MG AB. Collected data/did experiments for the study: MIM AM GR AB JS EK MP. Wrote the first draft of the paper: MIM MG AA AB. Contributed to the writing of the paper: MIM AM GR AB JS EK MG MP PO AA. Supervised the study: MG.
ISSN:1549-1676
1549-1277
1549-1676
DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000070