Detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in lung and nasal swab samples from pigs by nested PCR and culture methods

We examined nasal swab and lung homogenate samples collected from pigs experimentally and naturally infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae for the detection of M. hyopneumoniae by the nested PCR (nPCR) and culture methods. In the 23 experimentally infected pigs, M. hyopneumoniae was commonly detecte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Veterinary Medical Science Vol. 67; no. 8; pp. 801 - 805
Main Authors: Otagiri, Y.(National Federation of Agricultural Cooperative Associations, Sakura, Chiba (Japan). Inst. of Animal Health), Asai, T, Okada, M, Uto, T, Yazawa, S, Hirai, H, Shibata, I, Sato, S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Japan JAPANESE SOCIETY OF VETERINARY SCIENCE 01-08-2005
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We examined nasal swab and lung homogenate samples collected from pigs experimentally and naturally infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae for the detection of M. hyopneumoniae by the nested PCR (nPCR) and culture methods. In the 23 experimentally infected pigs, M. hyopneumoniae was commonly detected in nasal swabs by the nPCR and culture methods at 4 weeks after inoculation, and there was a significant correlation (P0.01) between the titers of viable organisms in nasal swabs and in lung homogenates in the experimentally inoculated pigs. In the naturally infected pigs, on the other hand, discrepancies in detection were found between nasal swab and lung homogenate samples in 17 of 36 cases, although the presence of gross lung lesions correlated relatively well with the detection of organisms from the samples. Our results indicated that the diagnosis of mycoplasmal pneumonia by nPCR in individual pigs with nasal swabs is reliable under these experimental conditions. At present, nPCR with nasal swabs should only be used for monitoring the disease status at the herd level under field conditions.
Bibliography:L73
2006004235
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0916-7250
1347-7439
DOI:10.1292/jvms.67.801