Identifying the difference in time perception between major depressive disorder and bipolar depression through a temporal bisection task

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 17; no. 12; p. e0277076
• Main Authors: Liu, Panqi, Guo, Hua, Ma, Ruihua, Liu, Sijia, Wang, Xuan, Zhao, Ke, Tan, Yunlong, Tan, Shuping, Yang, Fude, Wang, Zhiren
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 05-12-2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Analysis; Biology and Life Sciences; Bipolar disorder; Bipolar Disorder - diagnosis; Care and treatment; Computer and Information Sciences; Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis; Diagnosis; Emotions; Engineering and Technology; Humans; Limen; Major depressive disorder; Medical diagnosis; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mental depression; Mental disorders; Perception; Perceptions; Physical Sciences; Sensitivity; Social Sciences; Temporal perception; Time Perception; Variance analysis; China
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277076

It is difficult to make a precise diagnosis to distinguish patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) from patients with Bipolar Depressive Disorder (current depressive episode, BD). This study will explore the difference in time perception between MDD and BD using a temporal bisection task.
In this temporal bisection task, 30 MDD patients, 30 BD patients, and 30 healthy controls (HC) had to categorize a signal duration, between 400 and 1600 milliseconds (ms), as either short or long. A repeated measurement analysis of variance with 3 (subject type) × 7 (time interval) was performed on the long response ratio with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Origin software was used to calculate the subjective bisection point (BP), difference limen (DL), and Weber ratio (WR). The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale for depression-17 was used to assess depressive symptoms in the patients.
The data showed that the interaction effect between subject type and duration was significant (F (6,498) = 4.656, p <0.001, η2p = 0.101). At 400 ms, and the long response of the MDD group was greater than HC group (p<0.017, Bonferroni-corrected). At 1200, 1400 and 1600 ms, the long response of BD group is smaller than HC group, (p<0.017, Bonferroni-corrected). The one-way ANOVA revealed significant difference among the HC, MDD and BD groups in the BP values WR values, F(2, 81) = 3.462, p = 0.036 vs. F(2, 81) = 3.311, p = 0.042. Post-hoc tests showed that the value of BP in the MDD group was less than BD group (p = 0.027) and the value of BP in the MDD group was less than HC group (p = 0.027), while there was not significant difference of BP values between BD group and HC group. The WR values in MDD group larger than the HC group (p = 0.022).
Severity of depression not divided and analyzed according to the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score.
The time perception of the MDD and BD groups was different from that of the HC group, they overestimated short time periods. Compared with the BD group, the MDD group had a smaller time bisector, and these patients felt that time passed more slowly. The time sensitivity of MDD group and BD group were less than the HC group. However, there was no statistical difference in time sensitivity between the MDD and BD groups.