Accelerometer counts and raw acceleration output in relation to mechanical loading

Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of accelerometer output, in counts (ActiGraph GT1M) and as raw accelerations (ActiGraph GT3X+ and GENEA), with ground reaction force (GRF) in adults. Ten participants (age: 29.4±8.2 yr, mass: 74.3±9.8 kg, height: 1.76±0.09 m) performe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomechanics Vol. 45; no. 3; pp. 448 - 454
Main Authors: Rowlands, A.V, Stiles, V.H
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 02-02-2012
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of accelerometer output, in counts (ActiGraph GT1M) and as raw accelerations (ActiGraph GT3X+ and GENEA), with ground reaction force (GRF) in adults. Ten participants (age: 29.4±8.2 yr, mass: 74.3±9.8 kg, height: 1.76±0.09 m) performed eight trials each of: slow walking, brisk walking, slow running, faster running and box drops. GRF data were collected for one step per trial (walking and running) using a force plate. Low jumps and higher jumps (one per second) were performed for 20 s each on the force plate. For box drops, participants dropped from a 35 cm box onto the force plate. Throughout, three accelerometers were worn at the hip: GT1M, GT3X+ and GENEA. A further GT3X+ and GENEA were worn on the left and right wrist, respectively. GT1M counts correlated with peak impact force ( r =0.85, p <0.05), average resultant force ( r =0.73, p <0.05) and peak loading rate ( r =0.76, p <0.05). Accelerations from the GT3X+ and GENEA correlated with average resultant force and peak loading rate irrespective of whether monitors were worn at the hip or wrist ( r >0.82, p <0.05, r >0.63 p <0.05, respectively). In conclusion, accelerometer count and raw acceleration output correlate positively with GRF and thus may be appropriate for the quantification of activity beneficial to bone. Wrist-worn monitors show a similar relationship with GRF as hip-worn monitors, suggesting that wrist-worn monitors may be a viable option for future studies looking at bone health.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0021-9290
1873-2380
DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.006