Low concentrations of silver nanoparticles in biosolids cause adverse ecosystem responses under realistic field scenario

A large fraction of engineered nanomaterials in consumer and commercial products will reach natural ecosystems. To date, research on the biological impacts of environmental nanomaterial exposures has largely focused on high-concentration exposures in mechanistic lab studies with single strains of mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 8; no. 2; p. e57189
Main Authors: Colman, Benjamin P, Arnaout, Christina L, Anciaux, Sarah, Gunsch, Claudia K, Hochella, Jr, Michael F, Kim, Bojeong, Lowry, Gregory V, McGill, Bonnie M, Reinsch, Brian C, Richardson, Curtis J, Unrine, Jason M, Wright, Justin P, Yin, Liyan, Bernhardt, Emily S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 27-02-2013
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A large fraction of engineered nanomaterials in consumer and commercial products will reach natural ecosystems. To date, research on the biological impacts of environmental nanomaterial exposures has largely focused on high-concentration exposures in mechanistic lab studies with single strains of model organisms. These results are difficult to extrapolate to ecosystems, where exposures will likely be at low-concentrations and which are inhabited by a diversity of organisms. Here we show adverse responses of plants and microorganisms in a replicated long-term terrestrial mesocosm field experiment following a single low dose of silver nanoparticles (0.14 mg Ag kg(-1) soil) applied via a likely route of exposure, sewage biosolid application. While total aboveground plant biomass did not differ between treatments receiving biosolids, one plant species, Microstegium vimeneum, had 32 % less biomass in the Slurry+AgNP treatment relative to the Slurry only treatment. Microorganisms were also affected by AgNP treatment, which gave a significantly different community composition of bacteria in the Slurry+AgNPs as opposed to the Slurry treatment one day after addition as analyzed by T-RFLP analysis of 16S-rRNA genes. After eight days, N2O flux was 4.5 fold higher in the Slurry+AgNPs treatment than the Slurry treatment. After fifty days, community composition and N2O flux of the Slurry+AgNPs treatment converged with the Slurry. However, the soil microbial extracellular enzymes leucine amino peptidase and phosphatase had 52 and 27% lower activities, respectively, while microbial biomass was 35% lower than the Slurry. We also show that the magnitude of these responses was in all cases as large as or larger than the positive control, AgNO3, added at 4-fold the Ag concentration of the silver nanoparticles.
Bibliography:SLAC-REPRINT-2014-120
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
AC02-76SF00515
Competing Interests: While one of our coauthors, JW, is a PLOS ONE Editorial Board member, this fact does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the PLOS ONE guide for authors.
Editing and revising the manuscript: BPC CLA SA CKG MFH BK GVL BMM BCR CJR JMU JPW LY ESB. Conceived and designed the experiments: ESB JPW BPC CKG CLA CJR. Performed the experiments: ESB BMM JPW BK BPC. Analyzed the data: BMM BK BPC SA JMU BCR GVL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ESB JPW MFH CJR. Wrote the paper: BPC ESB.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0057189