A Nationwide Survey of Quality of End-of-Life Cancer Care in Designated Cancer Centers, Inpatient Palliative Care Units, and Home Hospices in Japan: The J-HOPE Study

• Published in: Journal of pain and symptom management Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 38 - 47.e3
• Main Authors: Miyashita, Mitsunori, RN, PhD, Morita, Tatsuya, MD, Sato, Kazuki, RN, PhD, Tsuneto, Satoru, MD, PhD, Shima, Yasuo, MD, PhD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-07-2015
• Subjects: Aged; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care; bereaved family members; Bereavement; Consumer Behavior; Cross-Sectional Studies; Death; Family - psychology; Female; good death; Hospice Care; Hospices - economics; Hospices - methods; Humans; Inpatients; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; neoplasms; Neoplasms - economics; Neoplasms - psychology; Neoplasms - therapy; Pain Medicine; Palliative care; Palliative Care - economics; Palliative Care - methods; Quality Assurance, Health Care; quality of care; Quality of Health Care; satisfaction; Self Report; Terminal Care - economics; Terminal Care - methods; Palliative care; good death; satisfaction; neoplasms; quality of care; bereaved family members
• ISSN: 0885-3924; 1873-6513
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.01.007

Abstract Context End-of-life (EOL) cancer care in general hospitals and home care has not previously been evaluated in Japan. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate EOL cancer care from the perspective of bereaved family members in nationwide designated cancer centers, inpatient palliative care units (PCUs), and home hospices in Japan. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, anonymous, self-report questionnaire survey for bereaved family members of cancer patients in March 2008 for 56 designated cancer centers and in June 2007 for 100 PCUs and 14 home hospices. Outcomes were overall care satisfaction, structure and process of care (Care Evaluation Scale), and achievement of a good death (Good Death Inventory). Results In designated cancer centers, PCUs, and home hospices, 2794 (response rate 59%), 5312 (response rate 69%), and 292 (response rate 67%) bereaved family members participated, respectively. Mean scores for overall care satisfaction were high for all places of death, at 4.3 ± 1.2 for designated cancer centers, 5.0 ± 1.2 for PCUs, and 5.0 ± 1.0 for home hospices. Designated cancer centers showed significantly lower ratings than PCUs and home hospices for structure and process of care and achievement of a good death ( P  = 0.0001 each). Home hospices were rated significantly higher than PCUs for achievement of a good death ( P  = 0.0001). Conclusion The main findings of this study were: 1) overall, bereaved family members were satisfied with end-of-life care in all three places of death; 2) designated cancer centers were inferior to PCUs and home hospices and had more room for improvement; and 3) home hospices were rated higher than PCUs for achieving a good death, although home hospices remain uncommon in Japan.